IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-3sp7055-7068.html

Psychometric Properties Of The Multiple Choice Mathematics Items Of Junior Secondary School Certificate Examination In Ekiti State

Author

Listed:
  • OJO, Amos Adewale (Ph.D)

    (Department of Science Education, School of Science Education, Bamidele Olumilua University of Education, Science and Technology, Ikere Ekiti, Nigeria)

  • OLOFIN, Samuel Oluwaseyi (Ph.D)

    (Department of Science Education, Faculty of Education, Ekiti State University, Nigeria)

Abstract

The study examined the psychometric properties of the multiple choice Mathematics items of Junior Secondary School Certificate Examination in Ekiti State. Specifically, the study examined: the validity and reliability of the items of Junior Secondary School Certificate Mathematics Examination; the difficulty index of the items; and the discriminating power of the items. The design used in this study was ex-post facto-design. The data for this study were responses of the students to multiple-choice mathematics items of the junior secondary school certificate examination of Ekiti state. The population comprised of all the Junior Secondary School III students in Ekiti state that wrote 2022/2023 Junior Secondary School Certificate Examinations of Ekiti State. The sample for the stud consisted of 600 Junior Secondary School III students from public and private schools in Ekiti State, the sample was selected using multi stage sampling procedure. The instrument used for this study was the Ekiti State Ministry of Education JSCE multiple-choice objective test items in Mathematics for 2022/2023 session consisting of fifty (50) items and the students’ Optical Mark Reading – OMR (answer sheets). The items were believed to have been developed, moderated, validated, and used by Ekiti State Ministry of Education for JSSCE. The fifty multiple choice JSCE III mathematics items of 2022/2023 session were assumed to have been validated and moderated by the Ekiti State Ministry of Education before they were administered to the respondent. The data collected was analyzed using difficulty index and discriminating power. The Kr-20 was used to determine the internal consistency of the instrument. Based on the findings of the study, the items were moderately valid and internally consistent. However, the items maintained different difficulty level, and discriminating power. It is recommended that JSCE multiple-choice objective test items in Mathematics be subjected to psychometric analysis before administering it on the students.

Suggested Citation

  • OJO, Amos Adewale (Ph.D) & OLOFIN, Samuel Oluwaseyi (Ph.D), 2025. "Psychometric Properties Of The Multiple Choice Mathematics Items Of Junior Secondary School Certificate Examination In Ekiti State," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(3s), pages 7055-7068, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-3s:p:7055-7068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-3s/7055-7068.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/psychometric-properties-of-the-multiple-choice-mathematics-items-of-junior-secondary-school-certificate-examination-in-ekiti-state/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sylvester Sele Ebisine, 2013. "Cultural Imperatives in Differential Item Functioning (DIF) in Mathematics," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 2, October.
    2. Nambury Raju, 1988. "The area between two item characteristic curves," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(4), pages 495-502, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meulders, Michel & De Boeck, Paul & Vandenberk, Miek, 2009. "Going beyond the detection of differential item functioning in tests for personnel selection," Working Papers 2009/40, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.
    2. Jerry Welkenhuysen-Gybels, 2004. "The Performance of Some Observed and Unobserved Conditional Invariance Techniques for the Detection of Differential Item Functioning," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 38(6), pages 681-702, December.
    3. Silvia Golia, 2015. "Assessing the impact of uniform and nonuniform differential item functioning items on Rasch measure: the polytomous case," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 441-461, June.
    4. Youmi Suk & Kyung T. Han, 2024. "A Psychometric Framework for Evaluating Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: Differential Algorithmic Functioning," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 49(2), pages 151-172, April.
    5. M. Hidalgo & José López-Pina, 2011. "Item-fit evaluation in biased tests: a study under Rasch model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 715-734, April.
    6. Timo Bechger & Gunter Maris, 2015. "A Statistical Test for Differential Item Pair Functioning," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(2), pages 317-340, June.
    7. Gerhard Tutz & Gunther Schauberger, 2015. "A Penalty Approach to Differential Item Functioning in Rasch Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 21-43, March.
    8. Minjeong Jeon & Frank Rijmen & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2013. "Modeling Differential Item Functioning Using a Generalization of the Multiple-Group Bifactor Model," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 38(1), pages 32-60, February.
    9. Nadir Altinok & Claude Diebolt, 2024. "Cliometrics of learning-adjusted years of schooling: evidence from a new dataset," Cliometrica, Springer;Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie), vol. 18(3), pages 691-764, September.
    10. Yunxiao Chen & Chengcheng Li & Jing Ouyang & Gongjun Xu, 2023. "DIF Statistical Inference Without Knowing Anchoring Items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(4), pages 1097-1122, December.
    11. Sandefur, Justin, 2018. "Internationally comparable mathematics scores for fourteen african countries," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 267-286.
    12. Matthew J. Madison & Laine P. Bradshaw, 2018. "Assessing Growth in a Diagnostic Classification Model Framework," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(4), pages 963-990, December.
    13. Ting Wang & Carolin Strobl & Achim Zeileis & Edgar C. Merkle, 2018. "Score-Based Tests of Differential Item Functioning via Pairwise Maximum Likelihood Estimation," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 132-155, March.
    14. Juana Gómez-benito & María Navas-ara, 2000. "A Comparison of χ2, RFA and IRT Based Procedures in the Detection of DIF," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 17-31, February.
    15. Gerhard Tutz & Moritz Berger, 2016. "Item-focussed Trees for the Identification of Items in Differential Item Functioning," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 81(3), pages 727-750, September.
    16. Aura-Nidia Herrera & Juana Gómez, 2008. "Influence of equal or unequal comparison group sample sizes on the detection of differential item functioning using the Mantel–Haenszel and logistic regression techniques," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 42(6), pages 739-755, December.
    17. David Magis & Francis Tuerlinckx & Paul De Boeck, 2015. "Detection of Differential Item Functioning Using the Lasso Approach," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 40(2), pages 111-135, April.
    18. David Hessen, 2005. "Constant latent odds-ratios models and the mantel-haenszel null hypothesis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 497-516, September.
    19. Chen, Yunxiao & Li, Chengcheng & Ouyang, Jing & Xu, Gongjun, 2023. "DIF statistical inference without knowing anchoring items," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119923, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Jerry Welkenhuysen-Gybels & Jaak Billiet, 2002. "A Comparison of Techniques for Detecting Cross-Cultural Inequivalence at the Item Level," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 197-218, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-3s:p:7055-7068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.