IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-3p4613-4623.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of Abortion Within the Context of Unhu/Ubuntu Philosophy, Reproductive Health Education and Educational Leadership

Author

Listed:
  • Wellington SAMKANGE

    (Associate Professor: Midlands State University; Faculty of Education; Department of Educational Policy Studies and Leadership, P. Bag 9055, Gweru, Zimbabwe)

Abstract

There are several contentious issues that have remained on the international agenda for many decades now. These include the death penalty, legalization of euthanasia, legalization of homosexuality and legalization of abortion. There are general disagreements on the need to abolish the death penalty and or to legalize abortion. Some countries in Africa have laws that allow for abortion for specific reasons, while others prohibit abortion altogether. Some of the reasons that have found acceptance for abortion in some African countries include rape, poor health, and socio- economic reasons. Among the countries that have legalized abortion without any restrictions are Cape Verde, Mozambique, Tunisia and South Africa. Among other reasons, legalization of abortion is premised on the recognition of women’s rights to make decisions on matters that affect them. In Zimbabwe, there is an on-going debate on whether abortion can be legalized without restrictions. The paper examines the implications of abortion within the context of cultural practices, the Unhu/Ubuntu Philosophy, reproductive health education and educational leadership. The study used mixed research methods. A sample of one hundred and twenty participants was opportunistically selected. It comprised parents, school heads, university lecturers, university students and teachers. The participants were sampled from Harare and Chegutu in Zimbabwe. The sample was categorized based on age, gender, and educational qualifications. These three variables were considered important as they were assumed to have a bearing on the respondents’ views and opinions on abortion. Interviews, questionnaires and focus groups were used to generate data. These views and opinions were analyzed guided by the Unhu/Ubuntu Philosophy. The study concluded that abortion was generally perceived as some form of murder and culturally unacceptable within the context of unhu/ubuntu philosophy. The study noted that while productive health education is important in improving people’s perceptions, culture and religion remain central to people’s perceptions of abortion. Abortion remains a contentious issue that requires wider consultation in Zimbabwe.

Suggested Citation

  • Wellington SAMKANGE, 2025. "Perceptions of Abortion Within the Context of Unhu/Ubuntu Philosophy, Reproductive Health Education and Educational Leadership," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(3), pages 4613-4623, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-3:p:4613-4623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-3/4613-4623.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/perceptions-of-abortion-within-the-context-of-unhu-ubuntu-philosophy-reproductive-health-education-and-educational-leadership/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-3:p:4613-4623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.