Author
Abstract
Standardized assessments have a long history of being the go-to measure of learners reading achievement, teacher accomplishment, and school accountability. Despite significant advancements in educational practices and policies aimed at promoting inclusivity, there are persistent challenges in ensuring that standardized assessments accurately and fairly measure the literacy and numeracy skills of learners with disabilities. Hence, this research aimed to explore the inclusivity of standardized literacy assessments for learners with disabilities at lower primary school. Interpretive paradigm and qualitative intrinsic case study design were employed because the case study outcomes were intended to provide insights to the researcher about experiences of learners with standardized literacy assessments for learners with disabilities in selected lower primary special education schools. Data was collected from ten head teachers and ten teachers from semi-structured interview guide and were analysed thematically. The study revealed standardized literacy assessments are accessibility, accommodations and fairness for learners with disabilities. The study also showed standardized literacy assessments often contain inherent biases that disadvantage learners with disabilities, undermining the fairness and validity of these tools. The study suggested the need for prioritizing flexibility, personalization, and diverse representation in assessments, teachers can better reflect the true potential and strengths of every student while fostering an inclusive educational environment that supports all learners in their academic journey. Based on these findings, the study recommends the ministry of education through schools should be developing Standardised Assessments for Learners with Hearing Impairment and Visual Impairment.
Suggested Citation
Moses Chisala, 2025.
"Exploring Inclusivity of Standardized Assessments for Learners with Disabilities at Lower Primary Special Schools in Zambia,"
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(14), pages 652-669, March.
Handle:
RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-14:p:652-669
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-14:p:652-669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.