IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025i1p2229-2251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discrepancy in Knowledge, Attitude and Perception about Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatment among Infertile Couples Seeking Treatment at Government Clinic/ Tertiary Hospitals in Mumbai

Author

Listed:
  • Vaishali Chaurasia

    (Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai)

  • Prof. Sayeed Unisa

    (Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai)

  • Dr. Anushree Patil

    (Department of clinical Research, National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Parel, Mumbai)

  • Dr. Deepti Tandon

    (Department of clinical Research, National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Parel, Mumbai)

  • Pratibha Kokate

    (Department of clinical Research, National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Parel, Mumbai)

  • Anamika Akula

    (Department of clinical Research, National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Parel, Mumbai)

  • Dr. Vandana Bansal

    (Department of Obstetric and Gynecology and Fetal Medicine, Nowrosjee Wadia Maternity Hospital and Seth SG Medical College, Parel, Mumbai)

Abstract

Children are an invaluable part of human life, especially for infertile couples, and assisted reproductive technology (ART) brings hope to those struggling with infertility. However, attitudes towards treatment through ART are influenced by socio-cultural, financial barriers, and access concerns. Therefore, this paper aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and respondents’ perceptions about various ART procedures. Primary data from two hospitals in Mumbai was collected using a structured schedule. The study involved 200 couples married for at least 3 years and undergoing treatment for at least 6 months. In the study, husbands showed greater awareness of donor oocytes (48.5% vs wife 35), sperm (65.5%), and egg freezing (19.5%), while wives showed greater awareness of IVF (68%) and IUI (67.5%). Wives showed more positivity toward ART methods, especially IVF, IUI, and ICSI, while husbands were more favorable toward donor-related methods. Cultural stigma, affordability, and fear of treatment negatively influenced attitudes, with significant differences between sexes. ART experience, particularly IVF, positively influenced awareness and acceptance for both sexes. Awareness and attitudes towards ART differ between husbands and wives, shaped by gender, type of infertility, and previous ART experience. While wives favor advanced ART methods, husbands lean towards donor-derived treatments. Stigma and affordability remain barriers, highlighting the need for targeted education and support to encourage informed decision-making among couples facing infertility. The findings of the study emphasize the importance of tailored education to improve awareness and reduce stigma-surrounding ART.

Suggested Citation

  • Vaishali Chaurasia & Prof. Sayeed Unisa & Dr. Anushree Patil & Dr. Deepti Tandon & Pratibha Kokate & Anamika Akula & Dr. Vandana Bansal, 2025. "Discrepancy in Knowledge, Attitude and Perception about Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatment among Infertile Couples Seeking Treatment at Government Clinic/ Tertiary Hospitals in Mumbai," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(1), pages 2229-2251, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:1:p:2229-2251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-1/2229-2251.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/discrepancy-in-knowledge-attitude-and-perception-about-assisted-reproductive-technology-treatment-among-infertile-couples-seeking-treatment-at-government-clinic-tertiary-hospitals-in-mumbai/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:1:p:2229-2251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.