IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i9p2175-2185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mentorship of Academics in Higher Education Institutions: A Scoping Review and Future Research Agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Salmie Luben Sakarias

    (Namibia University of Science and Technology, Windhoek, Namibia Department of Governance and Management Science)

  • Michael Neema

    (Namibia University of Science and Technology, Windhoek, Namibia Department of Governance and Management Science)

  • Davy Julian du Plessis

    (Namibia University of Science and Technology, Windhoek, Namibia Department of Governance and Management Science)

Abstract

This paper aims to suggest a normative mentorship model that can contribute to the efficiency of academics at higher learning institutions. Furthermore, the article is focused on promoting a follow-up normative mentorship model based on primary data to be collected at the Namibia University of Science and Technology in Windhoek, Namibia. The research employed a scoping review using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews, a meta-analysis (Prisma) flow chart for the literature studied for this article, and qualitative content analysis to achieve the research objective. This objective included examining the benefits of mentoring strategies for mentors and mentees and exploring the challenges of mentoring strategy. The study’s findings revealed that mentorship practices generally contribute significantly to academics’ research productivity, enhancing their workload efficiency and giving them a crucial role in the development of graduate students and faculty members. The paper also details how mentorship strategies are challenged by both the dynamic process of a mentorship process and balancing the mentors’ capabilities with their responsibilities. The paper concludes that the mentorship of academics produces many favorable work outcomes, such as academic adjustment to organizational culture, career development and advancement, promotion, job satisfaction and constructive participation in the organization. Based on the findings, the study recommended that serious consideration and implementation of a formal mentoring strategy is required when institutions of higher learning mentorship strategies or frameworks are not formally recognized or implemented. Moreover, performance indicators should be clearly stated to ensure that the mission and vision of the institution are accomplished and that a conducive learning environment should be embraced. In conclusion, before the normative mentorship model can be implemented, all the various stakeholders in the academic ecosystem can buy into ensuring effective implementation and continuous monitoring and evaluation of the sustainable mentorship model for the benefit of most stakeholders, the students.

Suggested Citation

  • Salmie Luben Sakarias & Michael Neema & Davy Julian du Plessis, 2024. "Mentorship of Academics in Higher Education Institutions: A Scoping Review and Future Research Agenda," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(9), pages 2175-2185, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:9:p:2175-2185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-9/2175-2185.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/mentorship-of-academics-in-higher-education-institutions-a-scoping-review-and-future-research-agenda/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:9:p:2175-2185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.