Author
Listed:
- Muhammad Saladin
(Master Program in Law, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Semarang)
- Lazarus Tri Setyawanta
(Lecturer in Magister Law Program, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Semarang)
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze: 1) Is construction in the current marine vessel dispute settlement not ideal? 2) How to reconstruct the ideal marine vessel dispute settlement?. The research method used is empirical juridical with a statutory approach, concept approach, and case studies. The results showed that the settlement of marine accident disputes requires an ideal construction that includes several important aspects to ensure fairness and efficiency: 1. Comprehensive Regulation: Clear and detailed regulations regarding marine accident dispute resolution procedures are required. This regulation shall include the responsibilities of the various parties, claims procedures, and dispute resolution mechanisms, 2. Special Dispute Resolution Agencies: The establishment of specialized agencies that handle marine accident disputes can help speed up the resolution process. The institution should consist of maritime law experts, ship engineers, and other relevant professionals. 3. Arbitration and Mediation Procedures: The use of arbitration and mediation as an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) can reduce the burden on courts and provide faster and more efficient solutions. 4. Transparency and Accountability: The dispute resolution process should be transparent and accountable. Every step and decision taken must be well documented and accessible to the parties concerned. By implementing this ideal construction, the settlement of marine accident disputes can be more effective, efficient, and fair, thus providing legal certainty for all parties involved.
Suggested Citation
Muhammad Saladin & Lazarus Tri Setyawanta, 2024.
"Ideal Construction of Marine Accident Dispute Resolution,"
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3s), pages 5191-5203, November.
Handle:
RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:3s:p:5191-5203
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:3s:p:5191-5203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.