IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i1p1681-1704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parental Influence, Environment, and Personality Factors on Strand Selection of Grade 10 Students: A Structural Equation Model (SEM)

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamad T. Simpal

    (Esperanza National High School, Senior High School Department Esperanza, Sultan Kudarat, Philippines)

  • Jann Dae C. Fabro

    (Esperanza National High School, Senior High School Department Esperanza, Sultan Kudarat, Philippines)

  • Mechelle Jade G. Antonio

    (Esperanza National High School, Senior High School Department Esperanza, Sultan Kudarat, Philippines)

  • Sumaiyah H. Acoy

    (Esperanza National High School, Senior High School Department Esperanza, Sultan Kudarat, Philippines)

  • Nasrodin M. Bantas

    (Esperanza National High School, Senior High School Department Esperanza, Sultan Kudarat, Philippines)

Abstract

This study focused on determining the impact of parental influence, environment, and personality factors on the strand selection of Grade 10 students and proposed a best fit model. A Raosoft sample size calculator was used to determine the 328 randomly selected respondents currently enrolled at Esperanza National High School. A descriptive-causal research design was employed through the structural equation model (SEM). The mean, standard deviation, correlation, and path analysis were utilized to analyze the data. Assumptions were checked to ensure the proper utilization of inferential statistics. The path analysis was used to examine the three hypothesized models for the strand selection model. The findings of the study revealed a positive significant correlation between the strand selection and parental influence (r = .441, p = 0.00), environment (r = .545, p = 0.00), and personality factors (r = .726, p = 0.00). The findings further revealed that hypothesized Model 3 was the best-fit model for strand selection where parental influence (β = -0.2) reduces personality factors. In contrast, environmental factors (β = .66) increase personality factors (β = .64) on strand selection. Likewise, it was also noticed that environmental factors have a direct effect (β = .13) on strand selection. Thus, it is concluded that hypothesized model 3 is the best fit model for Grade 10 strand selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamad T. Simpal & Jann Dae C. Fabro & Mechelle Jade G. Antonio & Sumaiyah H. Acoy & Nasrodin M. Bantas, 2024. "Parental Influence, Environment, and Personality Factors on Strand Selection of Grade 10 Students: A Structural Equation Model (SEM)," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(1), pages 1681-1704, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:1:p:1681-1704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-1/1681-1704.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/parental-influence-environment-and-personality-factors-on-strand-selection-of-grade-10-students-a-structural-equation-model-sem/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aldrich Luigi C. Tortor & Rosalie L. Ohayas & Jerald C. Moneva, 2020. "Financial Status, Parents Influence, Peer Influence and Self-Choice of Students in Selection of Strand in The Senior High School, Cebu, Philippines," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 350-367, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Kathryne A. Illescas & Ardvin Kester S. Ong & Josephine D. German, 2023. "Online or Traditional Learning at the Near End of the Pandemic: Assessment of Students’ Intentions to Pursue Online Learning in the Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-24, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:1:p:1681-1704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.