IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v10y2026i6p9480-9498.html

Rasch-Based Validation of Agreement and Usage Instruments for Integrated Project Quality Management Systems in Construction Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Mohd Farhan Mohd Fauzi

    (Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM Johor Bahru, Malaysia)

  • Mat Naim Abdullah@Asmoni

    (Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM Johor Bahru, Malaysia)

  • Ahmad Sha’rainon Md Shaarani

    (Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM Johor Bahru, Malaysia)

  • Naqiyatul Amirah Mohd Said

    (Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM Johor Bahru, Malaysia)

  • Muhammad Saufi Sumali

    (Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM Johor Bahru, Malaysia)

Abstract

Integrated Project Quality Management Systems (IPQMS) require robust measurement instruments to assess how project quality processes are recognised and practised by key construction stakeholders. Although quality management systems, project quality management and integrated management systems have been widely discussed in construction research, limited empirical attention has been given to validating instruments that measure IPQMS processes across stakeholder roles. This paper validates agreement and usage instruments for IPQMS processes using the Rasch Measurement Model. The study analysed six datasets representing three stakeholder groups: client representatives, consultants and contractors. A total of 67 IPQMS process items were examined, comprising 20 client representative items, 22 consultant items and 25 contractor items. Each item was measured across two dimensions: agreement and usage. Rasch analysis was conducted using WINSTEPS to evaluate rating scale functioning, reliability and separation indices, item and person fit, unidimensionality, differential item functioning and item hierarchy. The findings demonstrate that all six instruments showed ordered rating scale functioning, acceptable to excellent reliability, meaningful separation indices, productive item fit and essential unidimensionality. Several items with elevated fit statistics were retained due to their theoretical relevance and contribution to the IPQMS construct. The results confirm that the IPQMS agreement and usage instruments are psychometrically sound and suitable for subsequent critical process identification and structural model development. The study contributes to construction quality management research by demonstrating that role-specific IPQMS processes can be empirically validated through Rasch measurement, thereby providing a defensible measurement foundation for future critical process identification and logit-based structural positioning.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohd Farhan Mohd Fauzi & Mat Naim Abdullah@Asmoni & Ahmad Sha’rainon Md Shaarani & Naqiyatul Amirah Mohd Said & Muhammad Saufi Sumali, 2026. "Rasch-Based Validation of Agreement and Usage Instruments for Integrated Project Quality Management Systems in Construction Projects," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 10(6), pages 9480-9498, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:6:p:9480-9498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/uploads/vol10-iss6-pg9480-9498-202607_pdf.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/view/rasch-based-validation-of-agreement-and-usage-instruments-for-integrated-project-quality-management-systems-in-construction-projects/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:6:p:9480-9498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.