Author
Abstract
Cameroon is endowed with rich biodiversity and extensive Genetic Resources (GR), along with Associated Traditional Knowledge (ATK) held by Indigenous People and Local Communities (IPLCs). To govern access to these assets, Law No. 2021/014 of 9 July 2021, which regulates access to GR, their derivatives, and ATK, as well as the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their utilization was enacted in 2021. Beyond aligning domestic legislation with international obligations, this legislative measure establishes mechanisms for sharing the benefits derived from the utilization of resources and knowledge within the national territory. Benefit-sharing is designed to be operationalized through Mutually Agreed Terms (MAT) with the active participation of the relevant IPLCs. Nevertheless, access to GR and ATK frequently occurs without securing MAT involving these communities. According to the 2026 National Report on Access and Benefit Sharing, while Cameroon has issued forty-eight (48) access permits, only four (4) of these instruments were executed subject to MAT involving IPLCs. Against this backdrop, a question arises regarding the specific legal circumstances that trigger benefit-sharing obligations. This study examines whether access to such resources and knowledge inherently generates benefits susceptible to equitable distribution among all relevant stakeholders. It adopts a dual approach, combining doctrinal legal analysis with an empirical inquiry drawing upon both primary and secondary sources. Ultimately, this paper offers a concrete recommendation that, if effectively implemented and enforced, will safeguard fair and equitable benefit-sharing, thereby fostering sustainable development.
Suggested Citation
MACHE NGASSING Darcise Dolores, 2026.
"Access and Benefit Sharing Mechanisms for Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge in Cameroon: A Legal Appraisal,"
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 10(6), pages 5137-5149, June.
Handle:
RePEc:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:6:p:5137-5149
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:6:p:5137-5149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.