IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v10y2026i6p1353-1367.html

Conflicting Judicial Decisions and Operation of Administrative Agencies in Nigeria: A Study of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)

Author

Listed:
  • Ojonuba Samuel Ochagana

    (Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management Science, Federal University Lokoja, Lokoja¬)

  • Martins Enefola Abutu

    (Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management Science, Federal University Lokoja, Lokoja¬)

Abstract

This paper examines the problem of conflicting judicial decisions and their impact on the operation of administrative agencies in Nigeria, focusing on the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). It explores how judicial inconsistencies arising from forum shopping, overlapping jurisdictions, and political interference undermine administrative stability and the effective implementation of public policy. Employing a qualitative legal and empirical research methodology, the study draws on doctrinal analysis, supported by empirical evidence from reported cases, institutional reports, and scholarly literature. Findings reveal that inconsistent judicial pronouncements, particularly in election-related cases, create legal uncertainty, operational confusion, and reputational challenges for INEC. These conflicts disrupt electoral timelines, weaken public confidence in democratic institutions, and erode key administrative law principles such as legality, consistency, and predictability. The paper further analyses the tension between judicial review and administrative discretion, highlighting how excessive judicial interference in administrative functions can compromise institutional autonomy. Comparative insights from other common law jurisdictions, including the United Kingdom and India, demonstrate that judicial coherence, strict adherence to precedent, and strong case management systems are vital for maintaining legal uniformity. It concludes that achieving judicial coherence and administrative stability in Nigeria requires strengthened judicial discipline, clearer jurisdictional boundaries, and procedural reforms to curb forum shopping. The paper recommends the establishment of centralised case databases, enhanced National Judicial Council oversight, and greater respect for administrative discretion. A balanced relationship between the judiciary and administrative agencies is essential for upholding the rule of law and sustaining Nigeria’s democratic governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Ojonuba Samuel Ochagana & Martins Enefola Abutu, 2026. "Conflicting Judicial Decisions and Operation of Administrative Agencies in Nigeria: A Study of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 10(6), pages 1353-1367, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:6:p:1353-1367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/uploads/vol10-iss6-pg1353-1367-202606_pdf.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/view/conflicting-judicial-decisions-and-operation-of-administrative-agencies-in-nigeria-a-study-of-the-independent-national-electoral-commission-inec/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:6:p:1353-1367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.