Author
Abstract
Conventional approaches to technology transfer regulation, anchored in formal legal instruments such as patent licensing, foreign direct investment and structured technical assistance, have been in the spotlight for decades as the primary channels that enable technology to be transferred, often overlooking informal channels. Much of technological learning, adaptation and diffusion in Cameroon occurs outside formal arrangements, and these processes are unregulated. This article examines informal technology transfer in Cameroon using a doctrinal and qualitative methodology, drawing on legal analysis of Cameroon’s statutory instruments, including the Investment Code, the revised Bangui Agreement under OAPI, and copyright legislation, alongside documented sectoral evidence from international development assessments across digital financial services, manufacturing, and the software ecosystem. The study argues that informal transfer mechanisms generate technological capabilities comparable to those produced by formal agreements, particularly through tacit knowledge, embodied skills, and relational learning. Yet, the absence of regulatory oversight creates challenges, including quality inconsistencies, intellectual property uncertainty, and weak alignment with national development strategies. Rather than imposing rigid controls, the article proposes a facilitative regulatory framework that recognizes the developmental value of informality. It advocates for soft law instruments, competency-based certification, and public-private coordination platforms to enhance knowledge circulation and inclusive innovation. Ultimately, the study shifts the focus of technology transfer governance from ownership and enforcement toward absorption, coordination, and facilitation grounded in the realities of informal technological change.
Suggested Citation
Chick Nchumi Ndum, 2026.
"Beyond Conventional Regulation of Technology Transfer in Cameroon,"
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 10(2), pages 80-90, February.
Handle:
RePEc:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:2:p:80-90
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:2:p:80-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.