IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v10y2026i2p2984-2999.html

Juridical Sovereignty Versus Substantive Autonomy: Rethinking African Statehood in Contemporary International Relations

Author

Listed:
  • Oji Nyimenuate Ngofa

    (Department of Political and Administrative Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, School of Graduate Studies, University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State)

  • Kialee Nyiayaana

    (Department of Political and Administrative Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, School of Graduate Studies, University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State)

Abstract

This study examined the divergence between juridical sovereignty and substantive autonomy in contemporary African statehood. Although African states possessed durable legal recognition, territorial integrity, and formal equality within international society, their capacity for independent economic, strategic, and institutional agency remained uneven. Drawing on dependency theory, the study analyzed how structural incorporation into the global political economy conditioned the exercise of sovereignty beyond its juridical form. A qualitative comparative case study design was employed, focusing on Nigeria, Burkina Faso, and Ethiopia. Data were drawn from scholarly literature, policy documents, and institutional reports and were analyzed through a structured thematic framework centered on economic structure, institutional capacity, security dynamics, and sovereign identity. The findings revealed that juridical sovereignty across the cases remained stable and internationally protected, yet substantive autonomy was mediated by commodity dependence, fiscal vulnerability, security interdependence, and internal identity fragmentation. Economic structures limited policy flexibility, security partnerships reflected relational rather than absolute autonomy, and fragmented domestic cohesion weakened institutional consolidation. While states engaged in strategic diplomatic repositioning and regional initiatives to expand bargaining space, these efforts operated within enduring structural constraints. The study concluded that African sovereignty functioned as a layered construct rather than a binary condition. Legal recognition persisted, but material autonomy required alignment across economic resilience, institutional strength, and cohesive sovereign identity. By refining dependency theory to incorporate security and digital interdependence, the study contributed to international relations scholarship through a multidimensional reconceptualization of sovereignty within global hierarchies.

Suggested Citation

  • Oji Nyimenuate Ngofa & Kialee Nyiayaana, 2026. "Juridical Sovereignty Versus Substantive Autonomy: Rethinking African Statehood in Contemporary International Relations," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 10(2), pages 2984-2999, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:2:p:2984-2999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/uploads/vol10-iss2-pg2984-2999-202603_pdf.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/view/juridical-sovereignty-versus-substantive-autonomy-rethinking-african-statehood-in-contemporary-international-relations/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:2:p:2984-2999. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.