IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bco/bsoaaa/v7y2022p30-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Occupational Well-Being: A Comparative Analysis of the Main Structural Models

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Voitenko

    (State University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

The analysis of the main models of the occupational well-being of the individual and their component composition revealed the absence of a generally accepted universal model. Existing differences in the ideas of researchers regarding the definition of the essence of occupational well-being and its components are caused, first of all, by the subjective nature of the researched construct. The purpose of this study is comparative analysis of models of professional well-being and different approaches to their construction. In accordance with the purpose of the study, general scientific theoretical methods were applied, such as comparison, generalization and systematization of data. Existing models are characterized by a variety of structural elements, are often overloaded with components and don't always have a clear mechanism for the formation of the subjective well-being of an individual. Therefore, it is advisable to continue searching for the optimal model of professional activity that creates conditions for achieving professional well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Voitenko, 2022. "Occupational Well-Being: A Comparative Analysis of the Main Structural Models," International Journal of Behavior Studies in Organizations, EUROKD, vol. 7, pages 30-39.
    • Handle: RePEc:bco:bsoaaa::v:7:y:2022:p:30-39
    DOI: 10.32038/JBSO.2022.07.03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://api.eurokd.com/Uploads/Article/519/JBSO.2022.07.03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32038/JBSO.2022.07.03?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bco:bsoaaa::v:7:y:2022:p:30-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sara Gunen (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.