IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bbz/fcpbbr/v4y2007i1p74-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Value at Risk (VaR) Using Volatility Forecasting Models: EWMA, GARCH and Stochastic Volatility

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando Caio Galdi

    (University of São Paulo)

  • Leonel Molero Pereira

    (University of São Paulo)

Abstract

This paper explores three models to estimate volatility: exponential weighted moving average (EWMA), generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) and stochastic volatility (SV). The volatility estimated by these models can be used to measure the market risk of a portfolio of assets, called Value at Risk (VaR). VaR depends on the volatility, time horizon and confidence interval for the continuous returns under analysis. For empirical assessment of these models, we used a sample based on Petrobras stock prices to specify the GARCH and SV models. Additionally, we adjusted these models by violation backtesting for one-day VaR, to compare the efficiency of the SV, GARCH and EWMA volatility models (suggested by RiskMetrics). The results suggest that VaR calculated considering EWMA was less violated than when considering SV and GARCH for a 1500-observation window. Hence, for our sample, the model suggested by RiskMetrics (1999), which uses exponential smoothing and is easier to implement, did not produce inferior violation test results when compared to more sophisticated tests such as SV and GARCH.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando Caio Galdi & Leonel Molero Pereira, 2007. "Value at Risk (VaR) Using Volatility Forecasting Models: EWMA, GARCH and Stochastic Volatility," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 4(1), pages 74-94, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bbz:fcpbbr:v:4:y:2007:i:1:p:74-94
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/download/425/648
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bogdan ZUGRAVU & Dumitru Cristian OANEA & Victoria Gabriela ANGHELACHE, 2013. "Analysis Based on the Risk Metrics Model," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 61(2), pages 145-154, May.
    2. Gabriela Anghelache & Dumitru-Cristian Oanea, 2014. "Main Romanian Commercial Banks’ Systemic Risk during Financial Crisis: a CoVar Approach," The Review of Finance and Banking, Academia de Studii Economice din Bucuresti, Romania / Facultatea de Finante, Asigurari, Banci si Burse de Valori / Catedra de Finante, vol. 6(2), pages 069-080, December.
    3. Pengfei Zhao & Haoren Zhu & Wilfred Siu Hung NG & Dik Lun Lee, 2024. "From GARCH to Neural Network for Volatility Forecast," Papers 2402.06642, arXiv.org.
    4. Victoria Gabriela ANGHELACHE & Dumitru Cristian OANEA & Bogdan ZUGRAVU, 2013. "General Aspects Regarding the Methodology for Prediction Risk," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 61(2), pages 66-72, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bbz:fcpbbr:v:4:y:2007:i:1:p:74-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Lasso (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fucapbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.