IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bbn/journl/2013_4_6_brzozowski.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison Of The Profitability Of Fruit Production For Farms – Belonging And Not Belonging To Producer Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • PIOTR BRZOZOWSKI

    (Research Institute of Horticulture, Skierniewice, Poland)

  • KRZYSZTOF ZMARLICKI

    (Research Institute of Horticulture, Skierniewice, Poland)

Abstract

In order to respond to modern market demands and stringent fiscal and labour rules, the nowadays farms are shifting more and more to small enterprises. At the present days the supermarkets chains are the main sales channel with still increasing rule, so only farms organized in bigger production and sales units gain the possibility to act as an equal partner for them. The research was carried out in Poland on thirty commercial fruit farms mostly with apple production in the years 2012-2013. Owners of sixteen farms were members of Producer Organizations (POs) and fourteen farms were owned by non-members. All data necessary for the calculation of the costs and profitability were obtained from producers who answered special questionnaires and participated in additional interviews. By calculating the profitability of the farms the subsidies belonged to POs were not directly taken into the account, because they go to the organization not to a single producer. Fruit growers in Poland, members of producer organizations have many economic benefits over their non-PO-members competitors. Accordingly to inquiry done during the investigation the most important advantage is to sale greater quantities of fruit at lower unit costs due to maintaining shared (mutually owned) storages, grading and packaging facilities. The others most important are reduced economical risk and lower transaction costs. The achieved unit price was on average 21.5% lower in the case of the members of PO’s, and the unit costs were on average 29.5% lower than those ones for individual farms. Then the total income of farm was taken into account the POs were unquestioned winners, with bigger value of market output per farm and higher net income per farm. The average individual farm selling fruits on its own had lower total net income per farm and smaller market output. The owners of individual farms also spend much more time to sell their fruit. By joining the cooperative farmers could increase their sale of fruit and save the time they otherwise spend for selling them individually. The members of POs have more time for better production practices which are very important for the quality ofproduced fruit.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr Brzozowski & Krzysztof Zmarlicki, 2013. "Comparison Of The Profitability Of Fruit Production For Farms – Belonging And Not Belonging To Producer Organizations," JOURNAL STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABES-BOLYAI NEGOTIA, Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Business.
  • Handle: RePEc:bbn:journl:2013_4_6_brzozowski
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://tbs.ubbcluj.ro/RePEc/bbn/journl/Negotia_4_2013.pdf
    File Function: Revised version, 2013
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    profitability; fruit; farms; PO’s;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bbn:journl:2013_4_6_brzozowski. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cornelia Pop (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fbubbro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.