Competition Policy in the European Union: The Lidl/ Plus Acquisition Case in Romania
In the context of a growing Romanian retail market in recent years, we analyse the acquisition of retail chain Plus by discounter Lidl, finalised in 2010. The subject is treated from the perspective of EU competition policy. We begin with a literature review on the main concepts used in competition policy and the major provisions of competition law in the EU. In section 2 we examine the involved parties in the concentration, namely Plus and Lidl. The starting hypothesis is that the concentration sets the stage for a potential dominant position able to distort effective competition in the EU and Romania. Section 3 comprises the detailed analysis of the case. First, we identify the dimension of concentration. Further, we calculate specific market concentration indicators, such as the concentration ratio and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index. We also determine the relevant market in product and geographical terms. Finally, we investigate the possible effects of the concentration on competitors, suppliers and consumers. We find that the acquisition of Plus by Lidl in Romania does not erect significant barriers to effective competition, by means of a dominant position. Also, the deal does not impede access to sources of supply and has no obvious detrimental effects on consumers.
Volume (Year): (2012)
Issue (Month): ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: 004 0264 599170
Fax: 004 0264 590110
Web page: http://www.tbs.ubbcluj.ro/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bbn:journl:2012_3_2_marinescu. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Cornelia Pop)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.