IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bbl/journl/v29y2026i1p240-255.html

Case studies of subjective data dimensions in business intelligence based on literature

Author

Listed:
  • Klara Antlova

    (Technical University of Liberec)

  • Martin Zelenka

    (Technical University of Liberec)

Abstract

Data quality is widely recognized as a decisive factor for the success of business intelligence systems, as it directly influences the reliability of insights, the effectiveness of decision-making, and the level of trust placed in analytical outcomes. Traditional approaches have emphasized technical aspects such as accuracy, completeness, and consistency. Recently, attention has shifted toward subjective, user-related dimensions of data quality, influenced by perception, trust, and understanding. This study responds to this development by defining and categorizing subjective dimensions of data quality and identifying the organizational and technical conditions affecting user perception and trust in business intelligence environments. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining a structured literature review with five case studies conducted in financial and non-financial organizations. Data from the case studies were gathered through semi-structured interviews with practitioners responsible for designing and managing data solutions. The findings revealed four distinct categories of subjective data quality (data access, usability, processing, and evaluation), which together capture the ways in which users assess the relevance, interpretability, and value of data. Six critical success factors were identified as essential in shaping these perceptions: data governance, metadata management, knowledge and competence development, organizational culture, technological infrastructure, and stakeholder relationships. From these insights, five best practices were derived that support the enhancement of subjective data quality, such as developing business glossaries, comprehensive metadata catalogues, and transparent documentation of data lineage. The study concludes that subjective data quality is co-produced by technological infrastructures and human factors, and it proposes a multi-layered model that integrates these dimensions to guide the design of business intelligence systems that foster trust, understanding, and greater decision-making value.

Suggested Citation

  • Klara Antlova & Martin Zelenka, 2026. "Case studies of subjective data dimensions in business intelligence based on literature," E&M Economics and Management, Technical University of Liberec, Faculty of Economics, vol. 29(1), pages 240-255, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bbl:journl:v:29:y:2026:i:1:p:240-255
    DOI: 10.15240/tul/001/2026-1-015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2026-1-015
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15240/tul/001/2026-1-015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bbl:journl:v:29:y:2026:i:1:p:240-255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vendula Pospisilova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hflibcz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.