IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bbl/journl/v28y2025i2p180-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A proposal of a relative weighted online 5-star rating system as a way to mitigate online reviews biases

Author

Listed:
  • Jiri Mazurek

    (Silesian University in Opava)

  • Cristina Perez-Rico

    (Rey Juan Carlos University)

  • Carlos Fernandez-Garcia

    (Rey Juan Carlos University)

Abstract

Online ratings and reviews can be considered an electronic word of mouth regarding the quality of goods, products, or services. Reviews provide crucial information for customers, therefore significantly influencing their behavior, and they enable feedback to businesses from their customers, increase visibility, drive sales, help in developing a brand and building trust and reputation among consumers. However, the current 5-star rating system currently used on many Internet platforms such as Amazon or TripAdvisor suffers several drawbacks (biases) such as sentiment bias, polarization bias, non-discrimination bias, or vocal minority-silent majority bias. Therefore, the aim of the paper is to propose a new (weighted) relative 5-star rating system which takes into account reviewers’ history (in the form of the average and variance of the past reviews) and transforms absolute aggregate ratings into relative ones, thus providing less biased information for consumers and businesses. In particular, the proposed system reduces sentiment bias and non-discrimination bias. Moreover, the proposed approach enables to reduce the influence of ratings made by bots or dishonest evaluators-humans. The real-world application of the proposed approach dealing with ratings of selected attractions in Madrid area is provided as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiri Mazurek & Cristina Perez-Rico & Carlos Fernandez-Garcia, 2025. "A proposal of a relative weighted online 5-star rating system as a way to mitigate online reviews biases," E&M Economics and Management, Technical University of Liberec, Faculty of Economics, vol. 28(2), pages 180-191, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bbl:journl:v:28:y:2025:i:2:p:180-191
    DOI: 10.15240/tul/001/2025-5-008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2025-5-008
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15240/tul/001/2025-5-008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bias; e-commerce; online reviews; online ratings; relative ratings;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M3 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising
    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bbl:journl:v:28:y:2025:i:2:p:180-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vendula Pospisilova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hflibcz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.