IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bba/j00004/v2y2023i2p7-16d87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regime Change Operation in Pakistan: Examining Yield as a Behavioral Pattern of Microblogging rumors during the Political-Obsessed Period

Author

Listed:
  • Jawad Saleemi

    (Business School, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

In the behavioral domain, this study discloses the pattern between microblogging-opinionated information and yields on the investment. This phenomenon is particularly related to the political instability in the Pakistan’s economy through the multivariate techniques. Pre-political crisis, the pessimistic sentiments were priced in yields on the investment. In environments of political instability, the intensity of decline in yields was more responsive against an incline in the negative opinions. Meanwhile, the intensity of increase in returns was less responsive against an incline in the positive opinions. The findings were further supported by the Bayesian approach. Before the political instability takes place in the Pakistan’s economy, the occurrence of yields was noted in response to the bearish market period. Post-political instability, there was a higher posterior probability for occurrence of returns against the bearish market period. Conversely, a higher posterior likelihood was noted for occurrence of investment’s yields in response to the bullish market period, but this relevance was not completely probable. From the impulse response analysis, the response of returns was reported against the standard deviation shocks in the microblogging sentiment indicators. The analysis may have potential implications in terms of disclosing the investors’ behavior from a political perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Jawad Saleemi, 2023. "Regime Change Operation in Pakistan: Examining Yield as a Behavioral Pattern of Microblogging rumors during the Political-Obsessed Period," Economic Analysis Letters, Anser Press, vol. 2(2), pages 7-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bba:j00004:v:2:y:2023:i:2:p:7-16:d:87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/eal/2/2/20/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.anserpress.org/journal/eal/2/2/20
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francisco Guijarro & Ismael Moya-Clemente & Jawad Saleemi, 2019. "Liquidity Risk and Investors’ Mood: Linking the Financial Market Liquidity to Sentiment Analysis through Twitter in the S&P500 Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beibei Niu & Jinzheng Ren & Ansa Zhao & Xiaotao Li, 2020. "Lender Trust on the P2P Lending: Analysis Based on Sentiment Analysis of Comment Text," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Gerardo Alfonso Perez, 2021. "Short-Term Event-Driven Analysis of the South-East Asia Financial Crisis: A Stock Market Approach," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-30, October.
    3. Shuang Liu & Juan Yao & Stephen Satchell, 2020. "Analyst Forecast Dispersion and Market Return Predictability: Does Conditional Equity Premium Play a Role?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Jawad Saleemi, 2023. "Microblogging Perceptive and Pricing Liquidity: Exploring Asymmetric Information as a Risk Determinant of Liquidity in the Pandemic Environments," Economic Analysis Letters, Anser Press, vol. 2(1), pages 1-9, March.
    5. Joon Chae & Ryumi Kim & Jaehee Han, 2020. "Investor Attention from Internet Search Volume and Underreaction to Earnings Announcements in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-29, November.
    6. Zhen Peng & Changsheng Hu, 2020. "Leveraged Trading, Irrational Sentiment and Sustainability in the Stock Market: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bba:j00004:v:2:y:2023:i:2:p:7-16:d:87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ramona Wang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.anserpress.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.