IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econth/y2026i2p275-299.html

Protecting the EU’s Financial Interests under the Recovery and Resilience Facility: Practical Challenges and Risks

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandar Sht. Shterionov

Abstract

The Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) constitutes a qualitative leap in European fiscal integration. For the first time, the European Union (EU) issues common debt in such an amount and channels the resulting resources through a direct-management, performance-based delivery model grounded in “financing not linked to costs.” This federative-style architecture entails a systemic recalibration of the balance between national autonomy and Union-level responsibility and, in doing so, generates novel challenges for the protection of the EU’s financial interests (PIF). This paper assesses the implications of the RRF’s delivery model considering the protection of the financial interests of the Union. It argues that the innovative approach relying on milestone-and-target verification changes what can be monitored, audited, and credibly enforced. Drawing on recent audit findings and the evolving anti-fraud framework, the analysis identifies both cross-cutting and RRF-specific practical challenges. Monitoring tools are stretched by methodological constraints: common indicators may capture implementation progress yet remain insufficient for measuring performance, and deriving an objective “overall error rate” is difficult when payments are detached from declared expenditure. Moreover, the combination of broadly drafted key indicators and administrative discretion can facilitate “formal compliance”, whereby reporting appears procedurally sound while implementation remains substantively incomplete. Finally, the RRF introduces the operationalization of the concept of “serious irregularities”, which raises questions as to legal certainty, evidentiary thresholds, and enforceability in practice. The paper concludes that the RRF confirms the Union’s capacity to deepen integration in times of crisis, and that this process always brings with it new types of risks and challenges. It also produces new categories of risk that demand calibrated safeguards.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandar Sht. Shterionov, 2026. "Protecting the EU’s Financial Interests under the Recovery and Resilience Facility: Practical Challenges and Risks," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 275-299.
  • Handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2026:i:2:p:275-299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://etj.iki.bas.bg/storage/app/uploads/public/6a2/69f/ce0/6a269fce05140903672675.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
    • K42 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law
    • F36 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Financial Aspects of Economic Integration
    • H81 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Governmental Loans; Loan Guarantees; Credits; Grants; Bailouts
    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2026:i:2:p:275-299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.