IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econth/y2005i1p35-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternatives for Refinement of the Complex Assessment of the Quality of Economic Research

Author

Listed:
  • Pano Loulanski

Abstract

The article identifies and analyses the main aspects of the quality of the scientific economic research, trying to draw alternative directions for the refinement of its assessment. In order to accomplish this, the following problems should be solved: generalisation of the essence of nature and mechanisms of assessment; assessment of the research content; assessment of the achieved causality “analysis-results” of the research process; analysis of the established negative features of the scientific research.

Suggested Citation

  • Pano Loulanski, 2005. "Alternatives for Refinement of the Complex Assessment of the Quality of Economic Research," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 35-49.
    • Handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2005:i:1:p:35-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ceeol.com/aspx/issuedetails.aspx?issueid=57d95c50-3abf-4883-862b-67af4688bcd4&articleid=34d06b7c-f942-4f91-923a-49f52c650bd5#a34d06b7c-f942-4f91-923a-49f52c650bd5
    Download Restriction: Fee access
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Z00 - Other Special Topics - - General - - - General
    • A31 - General Economics and Teaching - - Multisubject Collective Works - - - Multisubject Collected Writings of Individuals

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2005:i:1:p:35-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.