IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econth/y2004i7p66-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political Economy and Economics: Criticism of Attitudes towards Similarities and Differences between Them

Author

Listed:
  • Kamen Mirkovich

Abstract

This paper presents a detailed criticism of U. M. Ossipov’s thesis concerning the science of Economics, which he claims to be drifting away from its subject and who, in that connection, advocates the return of economic science to its classical and philosophical foundations. A constructive criticism of Ossipov's thesis is offered, and the need for synthesizing economics and political economy into theoretical economy is substantiated. In it, besides the theory of marginal utility, there must also be developed the theory of marginal value, and they should be given equal standing in economic science.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamen Mirkovich, 2004. "Political Economy and Economics: Criticism of Attitudes towards Similarities and Differences between Them," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 7, pages 66-95.
  • Handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2004:i:7:p:66-95
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ceeol.com/aspx/issuedetails.aspx?issueid=4c76a677-792d-45b3-b763-c611cd8aa253&articleid=3d24cdd8-bb67-4281-830a-e3ee98334fbb#a3d24cdd8-bb67-4281-830a-e3ee98334fbb
    Download Restriction: Fee access

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2004:i:7:p:66-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Diana Dimitrova). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.