Innovation and economic development
Theoretical and policy making aspects of interaction between innovation and economic development have been carried out. It has been proven that for small scale open economies the governance plays a major role in transformation of new knowledge into new products and services for the market. In this respect it has offered an analytical scheme consisting of five sectors: R&D, education, business, nonprofit and state, each of them having its international equivalents. Legal, institutional and financial environment exercise essential influence on the efficiency of their interaction. This analytical scheme is proved by experience of EU, and is applied for analyses of interaction between innovation and economic development in Bulgaria. Priorities for national innovation policy are identified, based on a survey of 50 respondents.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): (2003)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 3, Aksakov Str., 1040, Sofia|
Phone: (+359 2) 810 40 18
Fax: (+359 2) 988 21 08
Web page: http://www.iki.bas.bg
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Rossitsa Chobanova, 2001. "The Innovation Market in Bulgaria," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 7, pages 92-113.
- Jürgen Bitzer & Christian von Hirschhausen, 1998. "Science and Technology Policy in Eastern Europe - a Demand-Oriented Approach," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 67(2), pages 139-148.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2003:i:2:p:3-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Diana Dimitrova)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.