IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econst/y2012i3p25-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological Code of the New CAP and the Bulgarian Agricultural Producer

Author

Listed:
  • Plamena Yovchevska

Abstract

The paper presents the results of an empirical sociological study “Ecological Culture of the Bulgarian Agricultural Producer”, carried out on the territory of Blagoevgrad region in 2010. The results are representative for the agricultural producers from the region, characterized with small-land production. The high ecological culture of the respondents and their attitudes for future economic activity, registered by the empirical sociological study (ESS), are a serious potential for effective adoption of the new budget and reference frame of CAP in force since 1st January 2014. The ESS results show that in this region there is a stable consistence between natural resources, pro-ecological practices and agricultural activity. This is a significant condition for a successful application of the new CAP – more effective policy for more competitive and sustainable agriculture and active rural regions. This goal can be achieved through innovations, knowledge transfer, cooperation in the food chain, effective use of resources, maintaining the ecological balance, the landscape, for ensuring food certainty and quality achieved by ecological payments on the so-called “green measures”. In the new CAP (2014-2020) one third of the expenditures for developing rural regions are foreseen for ecological payments. The results of the carried out ESS show very good knowledge of the ecological code of CAP, a future main requirement to the agricultural producers. The new agricultural policy is an answer to the challenges to the agriculture – economic, ecological and territorial. The potential of the human factor for realizing the new CAP, registered by the carried out ESS, is high and is a guarantee for a successful overcoming of the conflict points between the economic activity of the agricultural producers and the environment. It is a significant advantage for the sustainable development of the region in economic, social and ecological aspect.

Suggested Citation

  • Plamena Yovchevska, 2012. "Ecological Code of the New CAP and the Bulgarian Agricultural Producer," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 25-34.
  • Handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2012:i:3:p:25-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ceeol.com/aspx/issuedetails.aspx?issueid=934a60f9-e9c4-4ede-883d-b7f16605654a&articleid=54191174-161c-4b78-a858-529d1452df2c#a54191174-161c-4b78-a858-529d1452df2c
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bachev, Hrabrin, 2014. "Forms, Factors and Efficiency of Eco-management in Bulgarian Farms with High Eco-activity," MPRA Paper 58664, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • A14 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Sociology of Economics
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2012:i:3:p:25-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.