IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Is Public Capital More Productive than Private Capital: Evidence from Latvia 1995-2009

Listed author(s):
  • Olegs Krasnopjorovs

The purpose of this article is to estimate private and public capital contribution to economic growth in Latvia 1995-2009 using production function approach. It was found that both private and public capital have positive and statistically significant impact on economic growth and labour productivity. Moreover, public capital is 1.6 times more productive than private capital. Nevertheless, private capital accumulation affects technical progress through "learning by doing" externality. It was shown that total factor productivity and private capital formation were the main driving forces of economic growth in Latvia 1995-2009. It was pointed out that production function should be augmented with cyclical variables when output is constrained by the aggregate demand which is a case for Latvia in 2008-2009.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Fee access

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute in its journal Economic Studies.

Volume (Year): (2011)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Pages: 168-180

in new window

Handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2011:i:3:p:168-180
Contact details of provider: Postal:
3, Aksakov Str., 1040, Sofia

Phone: (+359 2) 810 40 18
Fax: (+359 2) 988 21 08
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2011:i:3:p:168-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Diana Dimitrova)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.