IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bal/journl/2256-074220184131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Gift For A Public Servant - A Manifestation Of Respect, Reward Or A Means Of Unlawful Influence

Author

Listed:
  • Tatiana Kolomoets

    (Faculty of Law, Zaporizhzhia National University, Ukraine)

  • Natalia Verlos

    (Department of Constitutional and Labour Law, Zaporizhzhia National University, Ukraine)

  • Yuliia Pyrozhkova

    (Department of Criminal Law and Justice, Zaporizhzhia National University, Ukraine)

Abstract

The article, based on analysis of scientific works and legislation of different countries, singles out problematic issues of legal regulation of relations connected with the reception of gifts by public servants. It is substantiated that in modern conditions a gift, unfortunately, can be used not only as a manifestation of respect and gratitude but also an unreasonable enrichment of public servant and unlawful influence on him, his official activity. Fragmentation, contradiction in the content of the "gift" legislation, its saturation with its evaluative and generalizing provisions predetermines the existence of "grey" zones in the legal basis of the use of a gift resource for public servants. Analysing existing prohibitive, restrictive, permissive models of "gift relations in the public service", the expediency of introducing an absolute prohibition on gifts for public servants is justified. It is proposed to provide exceptions for "ordinary" gifts,"official" gifts, and gifts on the occasion of special personal events, with the definition of limits of allowed behaviour. The mandatory declaration of all gifts received by a public servant, indicating its sources, seems expedient. The normative definition of a "gift" is proposed to be fixed in a special anticorruption legislative act, focusing on its disinterested symbolic, non-systematic nature, the legitimacy of acts of the servant as the basis for the gift, and the absence of any arrangements for its provision between the public servant and the "donor of a gift." As a result, it eliminates its mistaken association with unlawful benefits, public servant''s labour compensation, incentive, and indemnity payments. Taking into account the specifics of "official" ("business") gifts, detailed regulation of rules of conduct with them is proposed, including the possibility of their redemption, with the priority of realization and protection of public interest. The necessity of unification of legal principles of regulation of "gift relations in the public service" and coordination of provisions of anti-corruption (in the part of special prohibitions and declaration as a means of preventing conflicts of interest in the public service), tax (in terms of declaration of incomes and determination of the legality of their sources), and tort (liability for breach of established regulations) legislation is grounded. It is considered appropriate to form uniform legal standards for the implementation of "gift policy in the public service."

Suggested Citation

  • Tatiana Kolomoets & Natalia Verlos & Yuliia Pyrozhkova, 2018. "A Gift For A Public Servant - A Manifestation Of Respect, Reward Or A Means Of Unlawful Influence," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2018:4:1:31
    DOI: 10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-1-227-234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/368/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/368
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-1-227-234?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Varvara Vasileva, 2015. "Conflict of Interest Regulation in the Public Service: Brazilian Experience. (Part two)," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 3, pages 165-190.
    2. Varvara Vasileva, 2015. "Conflict of interest regulation in the public service: Brazilian experience. (Part one)," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 100-122.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tetiana Kolomoets & Nataliia Halitsyna & Serhii Kushnir, 2018. "The Statutory Definition Of Gift Value As A "Filter" For Effective State Policy In The Public Service," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(5).
    2. Tatiana Kolomoets & Semen Stetsenko & Anna Sharaia, 2018. "Gifts For A Public Servant: Whether It Is Worth To Comply With The Rules," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(2).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tatiana Kolomoets & Semen Stetsenko & Anna Sharaia, 2018. "Gifts For A Public Servant: Whether It Is Worth To Comply With The Rules," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(2).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    reward; prohibition; corruption; restriction; reception; gift; gift relations; public servant; public service; rules; unlawful acts; donor; conflict of interest;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
    • D74 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2018:4:1:31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anita Jankovska (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.