IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/azm/journl/v4y2025i1p104-116.html

Stalled on the Tracks: Institutional Failures and Comparative Reform Analysis of Pakistan Railways

Author

Listed:
  • Saba Anwar

    (Pakistan Institute of Development Economics)

  • Saneela Aslam

    (Pakistan Institute of Development Economics)

Abstract

Pakistan Railways has been in long-term decline, facing issues like poor service delivery, financial losses, and weak governance. Although various reform plans have been proposed over the years, most reforms failed due to poor implementation, political interference, and lack of continuity. This research aims to examine why these reforms did not succeed and to identify the main challenges in improving the railway sector. In this study we used a qualitative research approach based on thematic analysis. During Research process data was collected through semi-structured interviews with officials from the Ministry of Railways and other relevant departments. Secondary sources such as reports, articles, and policy documents were also reviewed. Key findings show that the main problems include lack of strategic planning, political inconsistency, weak institutional structure, financial constraints, and limited use of technology. The study also focuses on successful reform would require stronger leadership, reduced government interference, improved planning, and better public-private partnerships. This research contributes to the understanding of why state-owned enterprises like Pakistan Railways continue to underperform. It also offers practical policy recommendations to make the sector more efficient, competitive, and sustainable in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Saba Anwar & Saneela Aslam, 2025. "Stalled on the Tracks: Institutional Failures and Comparative Reform Analysis of Pakistan Railways," Journal of Economic Sciences, Federal Urdu University Islamabad, Department of Economics, vol. 4(1), pages 105-116, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:azm:journl:v:4:y:2025:i:1:p:104-116
    DOI: 10.55603/jes.v4i1.a7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jesciences.com/index.php/jes/article/view/158
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.55603/jes.v4i1.a7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Danish Bhutto, 2021. "A History of Pakistan Railways From Pre-Partition Times till Now: A Historical Review with Key Evolutionary Milestones," PIDE Webinar Brief 2021:59, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    2. Tomikawa, Tadaaki & Goto, Mika, 2022. "Efficiency assessment of Japanese National Railways before and after privatization and divestiture using data envelopment analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 44-55.
    3. Lin, Justin Yifu & Cai, Fang & Li, Zhou, 1998. "Competition, Policy Burdens, and State-Owned Enterprise Reform," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 88(2), pages 422-427, May.
    4. Vibha Kaushik & Christine A. Walsh, 2019. "Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm and Its Implications for Social Work Research," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Pedro Cantos & José Manuel Pastor & Lorenzo Serrano, 2010. "Vertical and Horizontal Separation in the European Railway Sector and its Effects on Productivity," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 44(2), pages 139-160, May.
    6. L. Di Pietrantonio & J. Pelkmans, 2004. "The economics of EU railway reform," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Intersentia, vol. 5(3), pages 295-347, September.
    7. Ha-Joon Chang, 2007. "State-Owned Enterprise Reform," Policy Notes 4, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    8. Jacques Pelkmans & Loris di Pietrantonio, 2004. "The Economics of EU Railway Reform," Bruges European Economic Policy Briefings 8, European Economic Studies Department, College of Europe.
    9. Campos, J., 2001. "Lessons from railway reforms in Brazil and Mexico," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 85-95, April.
    10. Johnson, Ginger A. & Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia, 2017. "Rapid qualitative research methods during complex health emergencies: A systematic review of the literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 63-75.
    11. Russell Pittman, 2004. "Chinese Railway Reform and Competition: Lessons from the Experience in Other Countries," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 38(2), pages 309-332, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Allen, John G. & Newmark, Gregory L., 2021. "Access protocols for railroads: Reframing the infrastructure separation debate," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Hörcher, Daniel & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2021. "A review of public transport economics," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    3. Tomeš, Zdeněk, 2017. "Do European reforms increase modal shares of railways?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 143-151.
    4. Huang, Wencheng & Zhang, Yue & Shuai, Bin & Xu, Minhao & Xiao, Wei & Zhang, Rui & Xu, Yifei, 2019. "China railway industry reform evolution approach: Based on the Vertical Separation Model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 546-556.
    5. Mette Asmild & Torben Holvad & Jens Hougaard & Dorte Kronborg, 2009. "Railway reforms: do they influence operating efficiency?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 36(5), pages 617-638, September.
    6. Feuerstein, Lisa & Busacker, Torsten & Xu, Jingjing, 2018. "Factors influencing open access competition in the European long-distance passenger rail transport — A Delphi study," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 300-309.
    7. Torben HOLVAD, 2017. "Market Structure and State Involvement: Passenger Railways in Europe," Departmental Working Papers 2017-04, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    8. Bai, Xuejie & Jin, Zeng & Chiu, Yung-Ho, 2021. "Performance evaluation of China's railway passenger transportation sector," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Fumitoshi Mizutani & Shuji Uranishi, 2013. "Does vertical separation reduce cost? An empirical analysis of the rail industry in European and East Asian OECD Countries," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 31-59, January.
    10. Jacques Pelkmans, 2006. "European Industrial Policy," Bruges European Economic Policy Briefings 15, European Economic Studies Department, College of Europe.
    11. Mizutani, Fumitoshi & Uranishi, Shuji, 2020. "An analysis of the inter-effect of structural reforms and rail mode share," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    12. Lehtinen, Jarkko & Bask, Anu H., 2012. "Analysis of business models for potential 3Mode transport corridor," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 96-108.
    13. Radim Ječný & Božena Kadeřábková, 2022. "Role státu ve výstavbě a provozu železnice od 30. let 19. století do 20. let 20. století v interakci s vývojem ekonomického myšlení v českých zemích [Role of State in Railway Construction and Operation from 1830s to 1920s in Interaction with Devel," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(2), pages 235-254.
    14. Marc Ivaldi, 2005. "Restructuring Railways: In Theory and Practice," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 3(4), pages 3-9, 01.
    15. Li, Chengming & Wang, Hanyang & Zhang, Changyun, 2026. "Digital transformation and corporate mergers and acquisitions: Evidence and mechanism in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    16. Guo, Shu & Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2023. "Green credit policy and total factor productivity: Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    17. Zhu, Ling & Liu, Shasha & Kong, Dongmin, 2023. "Governments' fiscal stress and firm decentralization," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    18. Hongjin Zhu & Yue Pan & Jiaping Qiu & Jinli Xiao, 2022. "Hometown Ties and Favoritism in Chinese Corporations: Evidence from CEO Dismissals and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(2), pages 283-310, March.
    19. Vladimir Popov, 2009. "Why the West Became Rich before China and Why China Has Been Catching Up with the West since 1949: nother Explanation of the “Great Divergence” and “Great Convergence” Stories," Working Papers w0132, New Economic School (NES).
    20. Lu, Susan Feng & Dranove, David, 2013. "Profiting from gaizhi: Management buyouts during China’s privatization," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 634-650.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade
    • F12 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies; Fragmentation
    • F60 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:azm:journl:v:4:y:2025:i:1:p:104-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Ihtsham Ul Haq (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.fuuastisb.edu.pk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.