Author
Listed:
- Beattie, Lee
- Haarhoff, Errol
Abstract
Achieving compact urban development is an urban planning policy approach embedded in a range of urban growth management strategies typically found in Australasian and some North American cities. These approaches aim to counter the adverse impacts of urban sprawl by seeking to consolidate future growth within an urban boundary in existing ‘activity centres’ and along transit corridors. Delivering these outcomes, however, together with achieving quality residential environments and viable communities, has proved to be problematic, especially on suburban peripheries dominated by car-oriented, low-density development. This paper presents a case study of a development known as University Hill in the City of Whittlesea, some 18 kilometres from downtown Melbourne. The authors argue that University Hill is successful in achieving a higher density, mixed-use development, and a walkable, quality neighbourhood, indeed an activity centre of the type envisaged in urban growth management policies referred to. The paper draws on information provided by key stakeholders responsible for University Hill, interviewed by the authors: the developers, the professional consultants and the regulatory authorities at local and regional levels. The authors argue that the successful outcome is related to the shared visions of the stakeholders, their positive working relationships and sufficiently flexible urban planning processes, which gave the developers confidence to be innovative while responding to market conditions. The case study raises issues about the effectiveness of conformance-based urban planning in achieving its intended outcomes. The case study could provide a useful exemplar of a successful activity centre elsewhere. The authors argue that the key to this success lies in the process of implementation adopted, which has the potential to be replicated elsewhere.
Suggested Citation
Beattie, Lee & Haarhoff, Errol, 2014.
"Delivering quality urban consolidation on the urban fringe: A case study of University Hill, Melbourne, Australia,"
Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 7(4), pages 329-342, June.
Handle:
RePEc:aza:jurr00:y:2014:v:7:i:4:p:329-342
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z33 - Other Special Topics - - Tourism Economics - - - Marketing and Finance
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aza:jurr00:y:2014:v:7:i:4:p:329-342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henry Stewart Talks (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.