Author
Listed:
- Crabtree, Phil
- Mackay, Ian
Abstract
The creation of a top-down planning system with the express purpose of delivering growth through housing development, and the loss of local control over development is a long way from the bottom-up, community-driven process originally envisaged in open-source planning. In contrast, the neighbourhood planning process offers local communities, working with local authorities and others, a genuine way of influencing and shaping their own future. Leeds has seen a particularly high level of interest in neighbourhood planning, in contrast with many other local authorities in the Leeds City region and beyond. This is probably due to the ambitious target for housing growth (70,000 new homes by 2028), well-organised parish and town councils and strong community forums, both within neighbourhoods and with the city council through previous work on supplementary planning guidance. Not surprisingly, initial interest came from the leafy, middle-class, parished suburbs, where there is a strong desire to manage and resist development, but the authors note that more deprived, inner-city communities are also embracing the opportunity to improve and develop their neighbourhood through local empowerment and meaningful involvement in the decision-making process. It is suggested that this has heralded a shift in approach from ‘doing to’ to ‘working with’. The paper focuses on two contrasting examples of neighbourhood planning work: Thorp Arch (rural locations with large industrial estate), and Holbeck (inner-city, deprived area). Thorp Arch is facing a large-scale housing development with supporting facilities and services, while Holbeck has a true bottom up approach with big ambitions and a desire for growth and investment.
Suggested Citation
Crabtree, Phil & Mackay, Ian, 2013.
"Neighbourhood planning: A new approach to consensus building?,"
Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 7(1), pages 34-41, September.
Handle:
RePEc:aza:jurr00:y:2013:v:7:i:1:p:34-41
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z33 - Other Special Topics - - Tourism Economics - - - Marketing and Finance
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aza:jurr00:y:2013:v:7:i:1:p:34-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henry Stewart Talks (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.