IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aza/csj000/y2022v6i2p111-118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Threat intelligence meets risk management for operational resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Walsh, Teresa T.

    (FS-ISAC, Reston, Virginia, USA)

Abstract

Threat intelligence, especially cyber threat intelligence, is often given limited value. Some treat it as mutually exclusive from resilience activities or decisions, while others may opine it is not valuable if it cannot be automated. In practice, applying a combination of threat data and intelligence analysis into a business risk management plan is an essential part of how cyber defence and risk management teams can effectively prioritise and focus their programmes. In order to manage cyber risks effectively, private sector companies need to branch out from intelligence-led security to intelligence-supported business resilience. This requires a holistic approach to establishing priority intelligence requirements (PIRs) and analytical products for specific stakeholders. Intelligence analysis is not created for other intelligence analysts but for those seeking to protect the company and its customers, such as risk and business continuity managers. Using the example of third-party and supply chain risks, this paper argues the merits of using advanced levels of intelligence analysis to support cyber defences, as well as risk management and operational resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Walsh, Teresa T., 2022. "Threat intelligence meets risk management for operational resilience," Cyber Security: A Peer-Reviewed Journal, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 6(2), pages 111-118, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:aza:csj000:y:2022:v:6:i:2:p:111-118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/7382/download/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/7382/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    cyber threat intelligence; risk intelligence; cyber security; priority intelligence requirements; governance and compliance; organisational resilience; third-party risk; supply chain risk; cyber intelligence analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aza:csj000:y:2022:v:6:i:2:p:111-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henry Stewart Talks (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.