Author
Abstract
What types of risk might the following professionals introduce to their business during a business trip with corporate information assets: CEO travelling to initiate acquisition negotiations; engineer travelling for impact analysis of new inventions with a business partner; VP Marketing travelling to ‘sell’ the benefits of his company’s latest product; cyber security expert responsible for network architecture design traveling to attend HACKFEST conference? The risk common to all these professionals is the exposure of their network to a sophisticated cyber security attack by infection, wiretapping, interception, substitution or sessions replay. This paper defines and considers Operational Technology (OT), as opposed to Information Technology (IT), which refers to computing systems that are used to manage industrial operations rather than administrative operations. Operational systems include production line management, mining operations control, oil and gas monitoring, etc. Due to the nature of the impact of potential threats, OT networks require maximum protection, not only in terms of data but also — and above all — to avoid security breaches that may have an impact on national security or even human life. Stuxnet, Dragonfly and BlackEnergy are well-known malicious programs that have damaged many OT networks, with major consequences for power production, storage and distribution. Stuxnet destroyed much of the centrifuge of Iran’s uranium enrichment programme. Germany revealed in a government report that a steel production furnace had been damaged in a cyber security attack by Dragonfly. At Christmas 2015, several Ukrainian companies in the energy sector were attacked by BlackEnergy, causing blackouts in at least eight regions of Ukraine. The paper concludes by encouraging OT professionals to focus on a model that leans on human, process and technology in order to provide the most appropriate mobility services.
Suggested Citation
Cissé, Moh, 2018.
"Risky travel: The missing piece for holistic cyber security risk management,"
Cyber Security: A Peer-Reviewed Journal, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 2(2), pages 131-142, September.
Handle:
RePEc:aza:csj000:y:2018:v:2:i:2:p:131-142
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aza:csj000:y:2018:v:2:i:2:p:131-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henry Stewart Talks (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.