Author
Listed:
- Cain, P.M.
(Marketscience LLC, USA)
Abstract
Quantifying the short-term activation and long-term brand-building role of advertising is a key part of commercial marketing mix modelling (MMM). To directly isolate each effect, a common practice applies both low and high-retention Adstock transforms to the same advertising variable. However, if, as is often claimed, activation and brandbuilding are different mechanisms, such a ‘dual-Adstock’ approach is inconsistent and inherently flawed. Not only does it characterise each effect in terms of the same type of distributed lag process, it approximates long-term behaviour with an ad hoc drift term. This can lead to spurious correlation issues, telling us nothing about the dynamics of long-term brand-building. In this paper we demonstrate the theoretical and statistical pitfalls of the dual-Adstock model with two empirical case studies. We argue that the only reliable way to separate both effects is to first identify whether a permanent (longterm) component is actually present in the sales data. If so, observed sales can be meaningfully decomposed into short-term stationary variation and long-term base sales evolution. Brand-building then equates to the role of advertising in driving the base, whereas activation corresponds to transitory movements around the base. To illustrate the point, we present three extant approaches, each focusing on an appropriate time series treatment of the long-term component. Contributions to the literature are twofold. Firstly, we demonstrate how a popular industry approach can lead to spurious claims of long-term effects, highlighting the need for more credible measurement techniques in MMM work. Secondly, we show how long-term effects can mean different things depending on the time series properties of the data. Consequently, if MMM practice is to provide meaningful industry generalisations, long-term effects must be clearly defined and measured. The paper concludes with managerial and industry implications, followed by avenues for future research. This article is also included in The Business & Management Collection which can be accessed at https://hstalks.com/business/.
Suggested Citation
Cain, P.M., 2025.
"Long-term advertising effects: The Adstock illusion,"
Applied Marketing Analytics: The Peer-Reviewed Journal, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 11(1), pages 23-42, June.
Handle:
RePEc:aza:ama000:y:2025:v:11:i:1:p:23-42
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aza:ama000:y:2025:v:11:i:1:p:23-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henry Stewart Talks (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.