A Comparative Study of Global Models for Measuring Administrative Integrity: Insights and Lessons for Iran (in Persian)

Purpose: This study aimed to identify and comparatively analyze the approaches and tools used to assess administrative integrity in leading global models, and to extract international lessons learned and propose a framework for enhancing administrative integrity in countries with institutional structures like Iran. Methodology: This qualitative study was based on a systematic review of the literature. We collected and analyzed data using Sandelowski and Barroso’s seven-step framework. Statistical population consisted of international documents and operational models developed by Transparency International, the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Data analysis was conducted through qualitative content analysis, and finally, interpretive validity was ensured through three-stage coding and researcher consensus. Findings: The findings indicate that global models for assessing administrative integrity are presented in two formats: national integrity systems and perception-based surveys. Transparency International’s perception-based indicators are suitable for international comparison but require supplementation with objective national data. UNDP’s approach emphasizes staff participation and incremental reform, while the OECD’s maturity models provide the most comprehensive institutional framework. Critical analysis shows that applying global models without contextual adaptation faces challenges such as weak institutional coordination and limited data transparency. Accordingly, the proposed hybrid model integrates perception–objective monitoring, organizational culture strengthening, and evidence-based structural improvement. Originality: This research represents the first systematic comparative review in Iran that synthesizes three major global frameworks, evaluates their strengths and weaknesses, and offers a context-sensitive adaptation proposal. Its findings provide an evidence-based foundation for administrative reform initiatives and trust-building efforts in the public sector. Recommendations: The study recommends designing a localized administrative integrity framework inspired by the National Integrity System, emphasizing training, civic participation, and institutional transparency.