Management And Analysis Of European Project Proposals In The Framework Programme 7
From the good practices of European project proposers comes the necessity to approach project writing for The Framework Programme. The common errors made by consortia that submitted project proposals within the FP7-2008-ENV-1 call are analysed in this paper. The analysis was made on more than 400 Evaluation Summary Reports, for every evaluation criterion, according to both the participant’s and evaluator’s guide. The result of the current analysis was used to draft the pre-screening tool intended for the National Contact Points (NCP), in order to support coordinators that submitted project proposals in subsequent calls approached on theme 6 – Environment, including climate change, of the Framework Programme 7.
Volume (Year): 2 (2012)
Issue (Month): 26 (June)
Pages: 25 - 38
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.univath.ro/facultati/facultatea_de_stiinte_economice|
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ath:journl:tome:26:v:2:y:2012:i:26:p:25-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Emilia Vasile)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.