IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asr/journl/v7y2017ispecialp54-68.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and international trade in health services. Impact and regulations

Author

Listed:
  • Driss Bakhouya

    (Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Adrar, Algeria)

Abstract

This article is interested in studying the impact of trade agreements on the quality of health services, and the statement of the role of the Ministry of Health to protect the quality of these services. The problems that arise in this study; how the application of GATT on trade in health, and services? This article also includes the impact of international trade agreements on the issue of attracting foreign investments in the field of health, and to clarify the government's ability to maintain the health and political, and the capacity of national health products to compete with foreign products. Different research methods were used in the study, including: analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction. However, the most used method was comparative considering the specifics of the subject under studying. The study ends by mentioning that although so far only a few countries where trade in health services has a major role, trading. However, there seems to be agreement that is wide enough, with respect to health services. Furthermore, Trade liberalization - or privatization - can may lead to the development of second-degree health care system.

Suggested Citation

  • Driss Bakhouya, 2017. "The General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and international trade in health services. Impact and regulations," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 7(Special), pages 54-68, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:7:y:2017:i:special:p:54-68
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An7v11/4.%20Bakhouya.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mia Mikic, 2007. "Health-related Services in Multilateral and Preferential Trade Arrangements in Asia and the Pacific," Working Papers 3007, Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade (ARTNeT), an initiative of UNESCAP and IDRC, Canada..
    2. Adlung, Rudolf, 2009. "Trade in healthcare and health insurance services: The GATS as a supporting actor (?)," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2009-15, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Оksana Strelchenko & Svitlana Okhrimenko & Dmytro Pavlov, 2020. "The Role of the Institute of Medical Law in the Postmodern Society," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 11(3), pages 145-159, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adlung, Rudolf, 2009. "Trade in healthcare and health insurance services: The GATS as a supporting actor (?)," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2009-15, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    2. Fahmida Khatun & Mazbahul Ahamad, 2015. "Liberalising trade in health services: constraints and prospects for South Asian countries," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 57-70, January.
    3. Wolfe, Robert, 2010. "Endogenous Learning and Consensual Understanding in Multilateral Negotiations: Arguing and Bargaining in the WTO," Working Papers 90885, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    GATS agreement; health services; health policy; the TRIPS agreement.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K13 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Tort Law and Product Liability; Forensic Economics
    • K32 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Energy, Environmental, Health, and Safety Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:7:y:2017:i:special:p:54-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.