IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asr/journl/v5y2015i2p7-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Whistleblowing in the Slovak labor law regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Krošlák

    (School of Law, University of Trnava, Slovakia)

  • Andrea Olšovská

    (School of Law, University of Trnava, Slovakia)

Abstract

Corrupt behaviour is a common practice with negative effects on the whole of society. For instance, if a company wins a public procurement contract in an unfair way, it enriches itself not only at the expense of competition, but also at the expense of the whole of society, as the best applicant has not necessarily been selected within such a procurement. The same applies in the case of a supplier launching an unsafe product onto the market, threatening the health of everyone who buys it. In order to prevent such malpractice and eliminate their negative effects, the cooperation of persons aware of such behaviours is necessary. In order to ensure such cooperation, however, the existence of instruments protecting whistle-blowers against various sanctions (especially by employers) is necessary. As Slovak legislation did not include a regulation of procedures for reporting malpractice and protecting whistle-blowers, a new law aimed at solving such issues was enacted in October, 2014. The given legal regulation took effect on January 1, 2015. This paper endeavours to provide basic knowledge of the environment that the given regulation entered, as well as information on the possibilities of individuals to protect social interests on its grounds.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Krošlák & Andrea Olšovská, 2015. "Whistleblowing in the Slovak labor law regulation," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 5(2), pages 7-24, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:7-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An5v2/1%20Daniel.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    malpractice; antisocial activity; employee; protection of a whistleblower of a serious antisocial activity; report;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K31 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Labor Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:7-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.