Author
Listed:
- Cristina Ioana Florescu
(Associate Professor at - Faculty of Juridical, Political and Administrative Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Bucharest, International Arbitrator and Business Lawyer)
Abstract
In the last decade, a constant concern became the extent to which arbitration is and can be characterized as an efficient process. Among the arbitration advantages, the speed and the reduced costs of this alternative method of dispute resolution were always mentioned, as an incentive in promoting and attracting users. One of the ongoing debates in international arbitration is whether the arbitration procedure could be faster and cheaper than litigation in front of the state courts and how to increase the recourse to arbitration by promoting a more efficient conduct of the proceedings. This article mainly describes how the arbitration specialists (institutions, arbitrators, parties and counsels), by respecting and adopting innovative instruments in the field, can contribute to the fairness and efficiency of the international arbitration process in which they are involved, in order to respond to the arbitration community most recent requirements related to transparency, predictability, security, accuracy, compliance and diversity. This contribution enumerates and stops on some current and interesting instruments which contribute to the efficiency of the arbitration, promoted by the arbitration community based on the practice in the field and which arouses the interest of the specialists. Some of those are not sufficiently convinced that these tools will be able to contribute in the long-term to the achievement of the cherished efficiency without affecting the advantages and the basic principles of the arbitration.
Suggested Citation
Cristina Ioana Florescu, 2020.
"Emerging tools to attract and increase the use of international arbitration,"
Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 10(2), pages 255-278, June.
Handle:
RePEc:asr:journl:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:255-278
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law
- K41 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Litigation Process
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:255-278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.