IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asi/arjoes/v9y2025i2p199-212id5537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Student opinions on the evaluation of performance with fuzzy logic method in art and design education

Author

Listed:
  • Sehran Dilmaç

  • Oğuz Dilmaç

Abstract

This research was conducted to obtain students' views on the evaluation of artificial intelligence (AI)-supported design applications in art and design education using the fuzzy logic method. It aims to provide a new perspective for educators in identifying real learning situations and deficiencies in art and design education. The study utilized the DALL-E AI tool developed by OpenAI in design projects assigned to students in a basic art education course. The research took place during the autumn semester of the 2024-2025 academic year with 21 first-year students from the Visual Communication Department at the Faculty of Art and Design of a university located in western Turkey, all of whom participated voluntarily. A semi-structured interview, a qualitative research method, was employed as the data collection model. The interview questions were validated and analyzed using MAXQDA qualitative data analysis software, with an inter-coder agreement of 97.32%. The findings indicated that evaluating students' work with fuzzy logic increased their creativity, positively influenced their motivation towards the course, proved to be a more reliable evaluation method compared to traditional approaches, and enhanced their self-efficacy by improving their technological skills.

Suggested Citation

  • Sehran Dilmaç & Oğuz Dilmaç, 2025. "Student opinions on the evaluation of performance with fuzzy logic method in art and design education," Asian Journal of Contemporary Education, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(2), pages 199-212.
    • Handle: RePEc:asi:arjoes:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:199-212:id:5537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5052/article/view/5537/8383
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asi:arjoes:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:199-212:id:5537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Allen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.aessweb.com/index.php/5052/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.