IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/rjearp/2016p90-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Demand: Exploring the Potential of Electronic Feedback on Assessment Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Snowden

    (School of Human and Health Sciences The University of Huddersfield Queensgate Huddersfield UK)

  • Ms Sue Daley-Yates

    (Business School The University of Huddersfield The University of Huddersfield Queensgate Huddersfield UK)

  • Jamie P. Halsall

    (School of Human and Health Sciences The University of Huddersfield Queensgate Huddersfield UK)

Abstract

This paper presents the findings from an evaluatory pedagogical project that utilised an ethnographic case study approach to examine factors influencing the use of online formative assessment and feedback within an undergraduate programme.The project posed the questions: What are the effects of introducing online formative assessment and feedback on learning and assessment performance? How effective is online formative feedback in enhancing student success?The study draws upon data collected from a sample of students (22) who volunteered to participate in the research over a period of one academic year. Data collection tools included: focus group interview, semi-structured questionnaire and student assessment data. The study demonstrates that formative feedback and assessment is beneficial for teaching and learning, and that electronic assessment can offer a more flexible approach that can complement f2f feedback. Online formative feedback in the context of this study had a positive effect upon academic performance and student satisfaction, and demonstrates that students find online formative feedback effective and meaningful. Whilst the small size of the sample influences generalizability, the findings agree with the wealth of literature surrounding formative assessment and the benefits that accrue to students from delivering effective feedback. In addition, evidence from participants in this study is reflected in reports such as the JISC guide: “Effective Assessment in a Digital Age†(2010) and the findings from the EBEAM Project (2012) (Ellis, 2012).

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Snowden & Ms Sue Daley-Yates & Jamie P. Halsall, 2016. "On Demand: Exploring the Potential of Electronic Feedback on Assessment Performance," Research Journal of Education, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 2(5), pages 90-99, 05-2016.
  • Handle: RePEc:arp:rjearp:2016:p:90-99
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/rje-2(5)90-99.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=15&month=05-2016&issue=5&volume=2
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:rjearp:2016:p:90-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/index.php?ic=journal&journal=15&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.