IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arh/jrujec/v12y2026i1p28-59.html

Tax reform in Central and Eastern Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Alexeev

    (Indiana University, Bloomington, United States of America)

  • Robert Conrad

    (Duke University, Durham, United States of America)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the evolution of tax systems in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union during the transition from centrally planned to market economies. Its main objective is to identify the principal directions of tax reform from the beginning of liberalization in 1989 to the stabilization of the basic tax structures by the mid-2000s. The paper combines comparative institutional analysis with country evidence on the reform of the value-added tax, personal and corporate income taxation, excises, tariffs, and property taxation. Particular attention is paid to the role of technical assistance, the sequencing of reforms, and the interaction between tax design and administrative capacity. The analysis shows that pre-reform tax systems were largely incompatible with market allocation and modern revenue administration because they operated mainly as accounting devices within state-controlled economies. During the transition, the VAT became the central instrument of reform, while income taxation had to be redesigned to reflect the growing role of private ownership and the need to coordinate individual and corporate tax treatment. Excise taxation and tariffs were gradually aligned with international practice, and property taxation developed more slowly because of institutional weaknesses in cadastres, valuation, and local administration. Although reform paths differed across countries, the long-run outcome was convergence toward a broadly similar tax model centered on the VAT, income taxation, selective excises, and an emerging local property tax. The paper concludes that successful tax reform required not only legislative change but also administrative modernization, public understanding, and adaptation to country-specific institutional constraints. The experience of the region illustrates the importance of revenue-oriented reform, implementation capacity, and learning by doing in periods of systemic economic transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Alexeev & Robert Conrad, 2026. "Tax reform in Central and Eastern Europe," Russian Journal of Economics, ARPHA Platform, vol. 12(1), pages 28-59, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:arh:jrujec:v:12:y:2026:i:1:p:28-59
    DOI: 10.32609/j.ruje.12.174938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rujec.org/article/174938/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32609/j.ruje.12.174938?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cace, Sorin, 2010. "Social economy in Europe," MPRA Paper 79941, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Alexeev, Michael & Janeba, Eckhard & Osborne, Stefan, 2004. "Taxation and evasion in the presence of extortion by organized crime," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 375-387, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keith Blackburn & Kyriakos C. Neanidis & Maria Paola Rana, 2015. "Organized Crime, Corruption and Growth: Theory and Evidence," Centre for Growth and Business Cycle Research Discussion Paper Series 210, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    2. Ethan Bueno De Mesquita & Catherine Hafer, 2008. "Public Protection Or Private Extortion?," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 1-32, March.
    3. Guerino Ardizzi & Carmelo Petraglia & Massimiliano Piacenza & Friedrich Schneider & Gilberto Turati, 2013. "Money Laundering as a Financial Sector Crime. A New Approach to Measurement, with an Application to Italy," Working papers 018, Department of Economics, Social Studies, Applied Mathematics and Statistics (Dipartimento di Scienze Economico-Sociali e Matematico-Statistiche), University of Torino.
    4. Iulian Stanescu, 2011. "Social economy: Contributions to labour market development," Journal of Community Positive Practices, Catalactica NGO, issue 4, pages 64-93.
    5. Barbara G. Katz, 2009. "Crime and Uncertain Punishment in Transition Economies," Working Papers 09-12, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
    6. Antony W. Dnes & Nuno Garoupa, 2010. "Behavior, Human Capital and the Formation of Gangs," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(4), pages 517-529, November.
    7. Guerino Ardizzi & Carmelo Petraglia & Massimiliano Piacenza & Friedrich Schneider & Gilberto Turati, 2014. "Money Laundering as a Crime in the Financial Sector: A New Approach to Quantitative Assessment, with an Application to Italy," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 46(8), pages 1555-1590, December.
    8. Barbara G. Katz & Joel Owen, 2007. "Political Uncertainty and Crime in Transition Economies," Working Papers 07-3, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
    9. Jiancai Pi & Pengqing Zhang, 2020. "Organized crime and wage inequality," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 67(3), pages 344-361, July.
    10. Keith Blackburn & Kyriakos C. Neanidis & Maria Paola Rana, 2017. "A theory of organized crime, corruption and economic growth," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 5(2), pages 227-245, October.
    11. Katz, Barbara G. & Owen, Joel, 2013. "Exploring tax evasion in the context of political uncertainty," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 141-154.
    12. Amalia Petrovici, 2013. "Social economy and social entrepreneurship: An exercise of social responsibility," Journal of Community Positive Practices, Catalactica NGO, issue 4, pages 3-15.
    13. Durnev, Art & Fauver, Larry, 2008. "Stealing from Thieves: Firm Governance and Performance when States are Predatory," CEI Working Paper Series 2008-12, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    14. Barbara G. Katz & Joel Owen, 2009. "Are property rights enough? Re‐evaluating a big‐bang claim1," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 17(1), pages 75-96, January.
    15. Dan POPESCU & Florina-Valentina NICOLAE & Cristina STATE, 2017. "Improving The Management Of Social Economy Enterprises,An Essential Factor For The Sustainable Development Of Local Communities," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 129-138, November.
    16. Angelica Miculaiciuc & Florica Stefanescu, 2017. "Comparative Aspects Regarding The Social Economy In Romania And Ukraine," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 95-106, December.
    17. Riccardo Novaro & Massimiliano Piacenza & Gilberto Turati, 2022. "Does money laundering inflate residential house prices? Evidence from the Italian provincial markets," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(4), pages 672-691, November.
    18. Sorin I. Blaga, 2020. "A Review Of Romanian Social Entrepreneurship And Further Research Agenda," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 15(4), pages 7-24, december.
    19. Ausloos, Marcel & Cerqueti, Roy & Mir, Tariq A., 2017. "Data science for assessing possible tax income manipulation: The case of Italy," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 238-256.
    20. Nicoleta MIHAILA, 2017. "Social Enterprises In European Union. Theoretical Aspects," Contemporary Economy Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 2(1), pages 53-62.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General
    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies
    • H26 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Tax Evasion and Avoidance
    • P20 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - General
    • P35 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - Public Finance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arh:jrujec:v:12:y:2026:i:1:p:28-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Teodor Georgiev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rujec.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.