IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arb/journl/y2026i1p22-56.html

Teleworking and Home-Based Work: From the Classic Labour Law Setting to the European Regulatory Framework for the Digital Work Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Andriyana Andreeva

    (University of Economics – Varna)

  • Emil Radev

    (University of Economics – Varna)

Abstract

This study examines the legal institutes of teleworking and home-based work as manifestations of the evolution of the classical model of the employment relationship in the context of digitalization and the development of the European regulatory framework of the digital working environment. The study defends the thesis that these forms of labour organization do not represent only an alternative way of performing the labour function, but a normative expression of a deeper transformation of classical labour law institutions, which acquire a new functional content without changing their fundamental principles. The methodology for conducting the study combines normative, comparative law, systemic, functional and doctrinal analysis of the national and European legal framework. The scientific contribution of the development is expressed in the construction of a two-layer model for the analysis of the development of remote work and home-based work, based on historical, normative and functional periodization, as well as in the substantiation of the concept of the digital working environment as a modern space of labour regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Andriyana Andreeva & Emil Radev, 2026. "Teleworking and Home-Based Work: From the Classic Labour Law Setting to the European Regulatory Framework for the Digital Work Environment," HR and Technologies, Creative Space Association, issue 1, pages 22-56.
  • Handle: RePEc:arb:journl:y:2026:i:1:p:22-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.cspace-ngo.com/arb/Issues/2026/1/2-AAndreeva-ERadev.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • K31 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Labor Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arb:journl:y:2026:i:1:p:22-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pavlina Ivanova (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.