IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199888134-39_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Retention, HIV risk, and illicit drug use during treatment: Methadone dose and visit frequency

Author

Listed:
  • Rhoades, H.M.
  • Creson, D.
  • Elk, R.
  • Schmitz, J.
  • Grabowski, J.

Abstract

Objectives. This study examined two major methadone treatment factors, visit frequency and methadone dose, posited to be important in reducing intravenous drug use and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission. Methods: One hundred fifty opiate-dependent subjects randomly assigned to four groups received 50 or 80 mg of methadone and attended a clinic 2 or 5 days per week. Results. Survival analysis indicated higher dropout rates for groups having five vs two visits per week (χ2 [1] = 7.76). Higher proportions of opiate-positive results on urine screens were associated with lower methadone doses (F [1,91] = 4.74). Conclusions. Receiving take-home doses early in treatment enhanced treatment retention. The 50-mg dose combined with five visits per week produced the worst outcome. Fewer visits enhanced retention at 50 mg, but opiate use rates were higher at this dose than they were for either 80-mg group. The HIV infection rate at entry was 9%. No subjects seroconverted during the study. Risk behaviors for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome declined over time regardless of group/dose assignment. These results have important implications for modification of regulatory and clinic policy changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Rhoades, H.M. & Creson, D. & Elk, R. & Schmitz, J. & Grabowski, J., 1998. "Retention, HIV risk, and illicit drug use during treatment: Methadone dose and visit frequency," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 88(1), pages 34-39.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1998:88:1:34-39_0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1998:88:1:34-39_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.