IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199787121937-1943_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sociodemographic factors and the variation in syphilis rates among US countries, 1984 through 1993: An ecological analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Kilmarx, P.H.
  • Zaidi, A.A.
  • Thomas, J.C.
  • Nakashima, A.K.
  • St. Louis, M.E.
  • Flock, M.L.
  • Peterman, T.A.

Abstract

Objectives. Syphilis in the United States is focally distributed, with high incidence rates in the South and in metropolitan areas nationwide. In this study an ecological analysis, using the county as the unit of analysis, was performed to generate hypotheses about community-level determinants of syphilis rates. Methods. Bivariate rank correlations and multivariate, backward stepwise elimination linear regressions were performed. Mean annual incidence of primary- and secondary-stage syphilis in a county was the dependent variable, and county sociodemographic characteristics (from census data) where the independent variables. Results. In the multivariate regression model, sociodemographic characteristics accounted for 71% of the variation in syphilis rates among counties. With other factors accounted for, the most highly correlated characteristics were percentage non-Hispanic Black population, county location in the South, percentage of the population that was urban, percentage Hispanic population, and percentage of births to women younger than 20 years. Conclusions. Most of the variation is syphilis rates among counties is accounted for by sociodemographic characteristics. Identification and remediation of modifiable health determinants for which these factors are markers are needed to improve the health status of these populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kilmarx, P.H. & Zaidi, A.A. & Thomas, J.C. & Nakashima, A.K. & St. Louis, M.E. & Flock, M.L. & Peterman, T.A., 1997. "Sociodemographic factors and the variation in syphilis rates among US countries, 1984 through 1993: An ecological analysis," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 87(12), pages 1937-1943.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1997:87:12:1937-1943_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1997:87:12:1937-1943_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.