IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199787101645-1648_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are the best coronary artery bypass surgeons identified by physician surveys?

Author

Listed:
  • Hartz, A.J.
  • Pulido, J.S.
  • Kuhn, E.M.

Abstract

Objectives. This study assessed the validity of surveys for identifying the best coronary artery bypass surgeons. Methods. Data on physicians who performed coronary artery bypass surgery were available from New York, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Data on physicians' reputation were obtained from one national and five city surveys. The measure of surgical performance was the mortality ratio (MR), that is, the ratio of the observed to the predicted patient mortality rate. Results. Mortality ratios were very similar for the 10722 patients treated by the 31 surgeons defined as 'best' doctors in the surveys (MR = .98) and for the 74 854 patients treated by 243 other surgeons who had more than a minimal number of cases (MR = .96). The mortality ratio was 1.34 for the patients treated by surgeons with the lowest volumes and .87 for the surgeons who performed more than 400 coronary artery bypass surgeries in 3 years. Conclusions. These results suggest that the quality of a coronary artery bypass surgeon may be more closely associated with patient volume than with the surgeon's reputation among peers.

Suggested Citation

  • Hartz, A.J. & Pulido, J.S. & Kuhn, E.M., 1997. "Are the best coronary artery bypass surgeons identified by physician surveys?," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 87(10), pages 1645-1648.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1997:87:10:1645-1648_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Susan F. Lu & Huaxia Rui, 2018. "Can We Trust Online Physician Ratings? Evidence from Cardiac Surgeons in Florida," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 2557-2573, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1997:87:10:1645-1648_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.