IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1996866844-850_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vaginal douching and reduced fertility

Author

Listed:
  • Baird, D.D.
  • Weinberg, C.R.
  • Voigt, L.F.
  • Dating, J.R.

Abstract

Objectives. This study investigated douching and reduced fertility. Methods. The monthly probability of conception for douchers and nondouchers was compared in a sample of 840 married, parous women in King County, Washington. Data on the number of months required to conceive were analyzed. Results. In comparison with nondouchers, women who douched were 30% less likely to become pregnant each month they attempted pregnancy. This relationship remained after adjustment for covariates, and it could not be explained by women douching for medical reasons. The reduction was not related to the type of douching preparation used. Young women who douched had significantly greater reductions in monthly fertility than older women (50% reduction for women 18 to 24 years old, 29% reduction for women 25 to 29 years old, and 6% reduction for women 30 to 39 years old). Conclusions. Douching was associated with reduced fertility. Further research is needed to determine whether the relationship is causal and, if so, to what extent it is mediated by pelvic infection. In the meantime, women should be informed that douching may have adverse effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Baird, D.D. & Weinberg, C.R. & Voigt, L.F. & Dating, J.R., 1996. "Vaginal douching and reduced fertility," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 86(6), pages 844-850.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1996:86:6:844-850_0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1996:86:6:844-850_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.