IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1996865684-690_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genetic screening for reproductive planning: Methodological and conceptual issues in policy analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Asch, D.A.
  • Hershey, J.C.
  • Pauly, M.V.
  • Patton, J.P.
  • Kathtyn Jedrziewski, M.
  • Mennuti, M.T.

Abstract

Objectives. This paper explores several critical assumptions and methodological issues arising in cost-effectiveness analyses of genetic screening strategies in the reproductive setting. Methods. Seven issues that arose in the development of a decision analysis of alternative strategies for cystic fibrosis carrier screening are discussed. Each of these issues required a choice in technique. Results. The presentations of these analyses frequently mask underlying assumptions and methodological choices. Often there is no best choice. In the case of genetic screening in the reproductive setting, these underlying issues often touch on deeply felt human values. Conclusions. Space limitations for published papers often preclude explaining such choices in detail; yet these decisions determine the way the results should be interpreted. Those who develop these analyses need to make sure that the implications of important assumptions are understood by the clinicians who will use them. At the same time, clinicians need to enhance their understanding of what these models truly mean and how they address underlying clinical, ethical, and economic issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Asch, D.A. & Hershey, J.C. & Pauly, M.V. & Patton, J.P. & Kathtyn Jedrziewski, M. & Mennuti, M.T., 1996. "Genetic screening for reproductive planning: Methodological and conceptual issues in policy analysis," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 86(5), pages 684-690.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1996:86:5:684-690_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1996:86:5:684-690_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.