IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1996863382-387_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long-term back problems and physical work exposures in the 1990 Ontario health survey

Author

Listed:
  • Liira, J.P.
  • Shannon, H.S.
  • Chambers, L.W.
  • Haines, T.A.

Abstract

Objectives. This study sought to provide data on the relationship of work exposures to long-term back problems in a population survey. Methods. The Ontario Health Survey in 1990 used a representative population sample of the province. It included data on long-term back problems, occupational activity, and physical work exposures. The current study examined relationships between these variables. Results. The prevalence of long-term back problems was 7.8% in working-age adults. It generally increased with age. Long-term back problems were more prevalent in blue-collar occupations and among those not working, as well as among people with less formal education, smokers, and those overweight. Physical work exposures-awkward working position, working with vibrating vehicles or equipment, and bending and lifting-were all associated with a greater risk of back problems. The number of simultaneous physical exposures was monotonically related to increased risk. Conclusions. Within the limitations of the data and assuming the relationship to be causal, about one quarter of the excess back pain morbidity in the working population could be explained by physical work exposures.

Suggested Citation

  • Liira, J.P. & Shannon, H.S. & Chambers, L.W. & Haines, T.A., 1996. "Long-term back problems and physical work exposures in the 1990 Ontario health survey," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 86(3), pages 382-387.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1996:86:3:382-387_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1996:86:3:382-387_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.