IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1995856837-839_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peer review of mammography interpretations in a breast cancer screening program

Author

Listed:
  • Feldman, J.
  • Smith, R.A.
  • Giusti, R.
  • DeBuono, B.
  • Fulton, J.P.
  • Scott, H.D.

Abstract

Mammograms from a statewide screening program were subjected to a blind review by a panel of expert mammographers. Ninety-five percent (173/182) of original normal mammograms and 53% (164/311) of original abnormal mammograms were reread as normal. In comparison with the expert panel, community radiologists were more likely to request a repeat mammogram in 6 months than to interpret a mammogram as normal or address their uncertainty with an immediate diagnostic workup.

Suggested Citation

  • Feldman, J. & Smith, R.A. & Giusti, R. & DeBuono, B. & Fulton, J.P. & Scott, H.D., 1995. "Peer review of mammography interpretations in a breast cancer screening program," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 85(6), pages 837-839.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1995:85:6:837-839_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1995:85:6:837-839_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.