IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/1995856832-834_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The limitations of breast cancer screening for first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients

Author

Listed:
  • Neugut, A.I.
  • Jacobson, J.S.

Abstract

Bitter controversy surrounds the recommendation of mammographic breast- cancer screening for women aged 40 to 49 years of average risk. This paper considers the case for screening women in their 40s with higher risk, specifically women who have one or more first-degree relatives with breast cancer. A review of the literature and of current knowledge suggests that screening such women is more cost-effective, in the sense of having a higher yield per mammogram and better predictive value, than screening women of average risk in this age group. However, there is no evidence that screening is more efficacious in reducing mortality in this subgroup than in other women in their 40s.

Suggested Citation

  • Neugut, A.I. & Jacobson, J.S., 1995. "The limitations of breast cancer screening for first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 85(6), pages 832-834.
    • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1995:85:6:832-834_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1995:85:6:832-834_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.