IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/199585121636-1641_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychosocial factors in maternal phenylketonuria: Women's adherence to medical recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Waisbren, S.E.
  • Hamilton, B.D.
  • St. James, P.J.
  • Shiloh, S.
  • Levy, H.L.

Abstract

Objectives. This study identified factors predicting adherence to medical recommendations in maternal phenylketonuria, which can result in severe fetal damage. Methods. Sixty-nine women with phenylketonuria, 68 of their acquaintances, and 69 women with diabetes mellitus were interviewed annually for 5 years. A model in which each stage in the maternal phenylketonuria life cycle represented a treatment-related goal provided a means to assess adherence. Results. At the stages of prevention of unplanned pregnancy, treatment initiation, and diet continuation throughout pregnancy, attitudes and social support were associated with adherence to medical recommendations. No specific variables were associated with outcome at reproductive decision making, but women with phenylketonuria were more likely to delay making a decision, resulting in unplanned and, hence, untreated or late-treated pregnancy. Conclusions. Women with phenylketonuria differed from their acquaintances and diabetic women in many respects, suggesting that special programs are needed. Greater emphasis on reproductive decision making is especially needed. Interventions that focus on improving social support networks and attitudes about treatment may increase adherence to recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Waisbren, S.E. & Hamilton, B.D. & St. James, P.J. & Shiloh, S. & Levy, H.L., 1995. "Psychosocial factors in maternal phenylketonuria: Women's adherence to medical recommendations," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 85(12), pages 1636-1641.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1995:85:12:1636-1641_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:1995:85:12:1636-1641_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.